How can we escape Thomae's relations?

Christian Krattenthaler; Tanguy Rivoal

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/0502276

How can we escape Thomae's relations?

Christian Krattenthaler·Tanguy Rivoal

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1879, Thomae discussed the relations between two generic hypergeometric $_3F_2$-series with argument 1. It is well-known since then that there are 120 such relations (including the trivial ones which come from permutations of the parameters of the hypergeometric series). More recently, Rhin and Viola asked the following question (in a different, but equivalent language of integrals): If there exists a linear dependence relation over $\mathbf Q$ between two convergent $_3F_2$-series with argument 1, with integral parameters, and whose values are irrational numbers, is this relation a specialisation of one of the 120 Thomae relations? A few years later, Sato answered this question in the negative, by giving six examples of relations which cannot be explained by Thomae's relations. We show that Sato's counter-examples can be naturally embedded into two families of infinitely many $_3F_2$-relations, both parametrised by three independent parameters. Moreover, we find two more infinite families of the same nature. The families, which do not seem to have been recorded before, come from certain $_3F_2$-transformation formulae and contiguous relations. We also explain in detail the relationship between the integrals of Rhin and Viola and $_3F_2$-series.

Explore related subjects

math.CA math.NT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Christian Krattenthaler, Tanguy Rivoal. 2005-02-13. How can we escape Thomae's relations?. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502276

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Fragment-wise differentiable structures

The $p$-modulus of curves, test plans, upper gradients, charts, differentials, approximations in energy and density of directions are all concepts associated to the theory of Sobolev functions in metric measure spaces. The purpose of this paper is to give an analogous geometric and ``fragment-wise'' theory for Lipschitz functions and Weaver derivations, where $\infty$-modulus of curve fragments, $\ast$-upper gradients and Alberti representations play a central role. We give a new definition of fragment-wise charts and prove that they exists for spaces with finite Hausdorff dimension. We give a replacement for $p$-duality in terms of Alberti representations and $\infty$-modulus and present the theory of $\ast$-upper gradients. Further, we give new and sharper results for approximations of Lipschitz functions, which yields the density of directions. Our results are applicable to all complete and separable metric measure spaces. In the process, we show that there are strong parallels between the Sobolev and Lipschitz worlds.

math.CA↗

arXiv2026

On the prime field spherical restriction conjecture in four dimensions: breaking the Stein-Tomas exponent and applications

Let $p$ be an odd prime. We prove the extension estimate $R_{S_j}^*(2\to r)\lesssim_r 1$ for every nonzero-radius sphere $S_j\subseteq\mathbb{F}_p^4$ and every $r\geq \, 34/11$, uniformly in $p$ and $j$. This improves the Stein--Tomas exponent $10/3$ established by Iosevich and Koh (2008). We also formulate a localized spherical restriction/extension conjecture that predicts the sharp dependence of the restriction norm on the size of the physical support. This conjecture implies the spherical extension estimates $R_{S_j}^*(2\to r)\lesssim_r 1$ for every $r>3$, and yields almost-every-pin distance estimates at the conjectured Erdős--Falconer exponent in four dimensions, up to an arbitrarily small power loss in the set-size hypothesis. Using the same method, we improve the bounds supplied by Fourier decay and Plancherel at intermediate support scales and derive new almost-every-pin distance estimates in $\mathbb{F}_p^4$.

math.CA↗

arXiv2026

A characterization of idempotent Schur multipliers

We prove that every idempotent Schur multiplier is a finite signed sum of contractive idempotent Schur multipliers. This was conjectured by Katavolos and Paulsen in 2003 and previously known only for translation-invariant Schur multipliers, by the Cohen-Host idempotent theorem. Concretely, we show that any boolean matrix $A$ with Schur multiplier norm at most $γ$ (or equivalently $\lVert A\rVert_{γ_2} \le γ$) can be written as \[ A=\sum_{i=1}^{L}σ_i B_i,\] where $L\leq 2^{Cγ^6}$ for an absolute constant $C$, $σ_i\in\{-1,1\}$ are signs, and each $B_i$ is a contractive idempotent Schur multiplier, that is, a boolean matrix whose $1$-entries form a union of all-one rectangular blocks, with no two blocks sharing a row or a column. As observed by Carenini, a key lemma in our work yields a new proof of the Cohen-Host theorem and gives a simple proof of the quantitative refinements of Green-Sanders and Sanders, with improved bounds. We include a self-contained exposition of these results in the case of finite groups.

math.CA↗