Search arXivSearch

arXiv · math/0506415

On the sums of series of reciprocals

Abstract

This translation has been published in Stephen Hawking (ed.), "God Created the Integers", published in 2007 by Running Press. There may have been some changes to the final published version and this copy. This is a translation from the Latin original, "De summis serierum reciprocarum" (1735). E41 in the Enestrom index. In this paper Euler finds an exact expression for the sum of the squares of the reciprocals of the positive integers, namely pi^2/6. He shows this by applying Newton's identities relating the roots and coefficients of polynomials to the power series of the sine function. Indeed, in other words this result is zeta(2)=pi^2/6, and Euler also works out zeta(4),zeta(6),...,zeta(12). His method will work out zeta(2n) for all n, but he does not give a general expression for zeta(2n); he gives a general expression involving the Bernoulli numbers in a latter paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leonhard Euler. 2008-02-05. On the sums of series of reciprocals. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0506415

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On the Reconstruction of SAS from Other Triangle Congruence Criteria, Part II: Eliminating the Pons Asinorum

In the first part of this work we showed that, within a Hilbert plane deprived of the Side-Angle-Side axiom, the Side-Angle-Angle criterion, together with a ray correspondence principle [\textbf{RCT}], the existence of angle bisectors [\textbf{AB}], the congruence of supplements of congruent angles [\textbf{SA}], and the Pons Asinorum [\textbf{PA}], suffices to reconstruct SAS. We left open the question of whether [\textbf{PA}] is genuinely required alongside the other three principles, noting only a qualitative asymmetry in the nature of the principles involved. In this second part we answer this question: we show that \begin{equation*} \textrm{SAA},\ [\textbf{RCT}],\ [\textbf{AB}] \;\vdash\; [\textbf{PA}], \end{equation*} so that [\textbf{PA}] is redundant among the hypotheses of our main theorem, which improves to \begin{equation*} \textrm{SAA},\ [\textbf{RCT}],\ [\textbf{AB}],\ [\textbf{SA}] \;\vdash\; \textrm{SAS}. \end{equation*} The proof adapts an argument recently given by Donnelly, who reconstructs SAS from SAA together with an angle addition axiom and the existence of angle bisectors.

math.HO

Descartes' Circle Theorem, Princess Elizabeth, and Spinors

In this article, on Descartes' famous "circle theorem," we first attempt to explain how the philosopher could have arrived at the equation that he presents without demonstration in a letter to Princess Palatine Elizabeth of Bohemia in November 1643 (a previously unpublished proof, to our knowledge). Then we report some stages of the subsequent generalization of this theorem, whose Cliffordian flavor, via the equivalence of a quadratic form and the square of a linear form, still mobilizes mathematicians today. This statement, which, over time, has undergone different extensions, Euclidean and non-Euclidean, has found, {\it in fine}, a spinor formalization. We see there the proof of what we may call, in a Bachelardian style, an "inductive value" of the truth, which extends by successive generalizations. We conclude, more briefly, with the contacts between Elizabeth and Descartes, and the perhaps symbolic meaning of these considerations on "kissing circles," as they are called in Anglo-Saxon countries, in the context of their correspondence on the soul and the body, and the question of passions.

math.HO

Mathematical folklore

We present reflections on an experimental seminar studying the human and cultural roots of modern mathematics.

math.HO