Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · math/0608642

A Poset Hierarchy

Abstract

This article extends a paper of Abraham and Bonnet which generalised the famous Hausdorff characterisation of the class of scattered linear orders. Abraham and Bonnet gave a poset hierarchy that characterised the class of scattered posets which do not have infinite antichains (abbreviated FAC for finite antichain condition). An antichain here is taken in the sense of incomparability. We define a larger poset hierarchy than that of Abraham and Bonnet, to include a broader class of ``scattered'' posets that we call $κ$-scattered. These posets cannot embed any order such that for every two subsets of size $ < κ$, one being strictly less than the other, there is an element in between. If a linear order has this property and has size $κ$ we call this set $\qkappa$. Such a set only exists when $κ^{<κ}=κ$. Partial orders with the property that for every $a<b$ the set $\{x: a<x<b\}$ has size $\geq κ$ are called weakly $κ$-dense, and partial orders that do not have a weakly $κ$-dense subset are called strongly $κ$-scattered. We prove that our hierarchy includes all strongly $κ$-scattered FAC posets, and that the hierarchy is included in the class of all FAC $κ$-scattered posets. In addition, we prove that our hierarchy is in fact the closure of the class of all $κ$-well-founded linear orders under inversions, lexicographic sums and FAC weakenings. For $κ=\aleph_0$ our hierarchy agrees with the one from the Abraham-Bonnet theorem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. D{ž}amonja, K. Thompson. 2006-08-25. A Poset Hierarchy. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608642

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Ultrahomogeneous hypertournaments

A $k$-hypertournament is a higher-arity generalisation of a tournament, consisting of a set together with an irreflexive $k$-ary relation such that the automorphism group of each substructure of size $k$ is the alternating group $\mathrm{A}_k$. We show that, for each $k \geq 3$, there are continuum-many non-isomorphic countable ultrahomogeneous $k$-hypertournaments, answering a question of Cherlin.

math.LO↗

Forcing with Symmetric Systems of Models of Two Types

The purpose of this paper is to present a general method for forcing on $ω_2$ and $ω_3$ with finite conditions, while preserving all cardinals and some fragments of $\mathrm{GCH}$. This method is based on the technique of forcing with finite symmetric systems of elementary submodels, and improves earlier versions of this forcing by including models of two types. We will present several applications of the pure side condition forcing and variants thereof, by adding a Kurepa tree on $ω_2$, a club subset of $ω_2$ that avoids infinite sets from the ground model, a function bounding every canonical function below $ω_3$ on a club, and a simplified $(ω_2,1)$-morass.

math.LO↗

Well begun is half done: the computation of Eulerian paths

We characterize the uniform computational strength of finding (one-way or two-way, directed or undirected) Eulerian paths in countable graphs. In the one-way case, for both directed and undirected graphs, this problem is Weihrauch-equivalent to $\mathsf{lim}\times\mathsf{C}_{\mathbb{N}}'$, where $\mathsf{C}_{\mathbb{N}}'$ is the jump of closed choice on the natural numbers. This refines the proof-theoretic strength of the existence of a one-way Eulerian path given by the reverse mathematics framework. The $\mathsf{C}_{\mathbb{N}}'$ component comes entirely from the difficulty of choosing a starting vertex: with a valid start prescribed, the problem is equivalent to $\mathsf{lim}$, which also characterizes the degree of the two-way directed/undirected Eulerian path problem. We also study the complexity of orienting the edges of a graph while preserving the existence of a one-way/two-way Eulerian path. In the one-way case, this problem is not computable, and we prove that $\mathsf{lim}_2<_{\mathrm{W}}\mathsf{OrientEP}<_{\mathrm{W}}\mathsf{C}_{2}'\sqcap\mathsf{Sort}_2$ and $\mathsf{OrientEP}\not\le_{\mathrm{W}}\mathsf{C}_{\mathbb{N}}$. On the other hand, valid orientations are uniformly computable for two-way paths and for one-way paths with a prescribed valid starting vertex.

math.LO↗