Search arXivSearch

arXiv · math/0611460

Optimum Branching Problem Revisited

Abstract

Given a digraph $G = (V_G, A_G)$, a \emph{branching} in $G$ is a set of arcs $B \subseteq A_G$ such that the underlying undirected graph spanned by $B$ is acyclic and each node in $G$ is entered (\emph{covered}) by at most one arc from $B$. Tarjan developed efficient algorithms (based on the cycle contraction technique) for the following problem: given a digraph $G$ with a \emph{weight} function $w \colon A_G \to \R$, find a branching $B$ of the minimum weight $w(B) := \sum_{a \in B} w(a)$ among all branchings with the maximum ardinality $\abs{B}$. We generalize this notion as follows: for a digraph $G$ and a matroid $\calM_V$ on $V_G$, a \emph{matroid branching} in $G$ w.r.t. $\calM_V$ is a branching in $G$ such that the covered set of nodes is independent w.r.t. $\calM_V$. The unweighted (cardinality) problem consists in finding a matroid branching $B$ with $\abs{B}$ maximum. We show that the general cycle contraction approach is applicable to this problem and leads to an efficient algorithm (provided that an oracle is given for testing independence in the matroids arising as the result of the contraction procedure). In the weighted version we are looking for a matroid branching $B$ that minimizes $w(B)$ (for a given weight function $w \colon A_G \to \R$) among all matroid branchings of the maximum cardinality. We show that if $\calM_V$ is a rainbow matroid (that is, nodes of $G$ are marked with colors and it is forbidden to cover more than one node of any color), then there exists an $O(\min(n^2, m \log n))$ method, matching the complexity of Tarjan's algorithm (here $n := \abs{V_G}$, $m := \abs{A_G}$).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maxim A. Babenko, Pavel V. Nalivaiko. 2006-11-15. Optimum Branching Problem Revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0611460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO