Deleting species from model food webs

Christopher Quince; Paul Higgs; Alan McKane

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0401037

Deleting species from model food webs

Christopher Quince·Paul Higgs·Alan McKane

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We use food webs generated by a model to investigate the effects of deleting species on other species in the web and on the web as a whole. The model incorporates a realistic population dynamics, adaptive foragers and other features which allow for the construction of model webs which resemble empirical food webs. A large number of simulations were carried out to produce a substantial number of model webs on which deletion experiments could be performed. We deleted each species in four hundred distinct model webs and determined, on average, how many species were eliminated from the web as a result. Typically only a small number of species became extinct; in no instance was the web close to collapse. Next, we examined how the the probability of extinction of a species depended on its relationship with the deleted species. This involved the exploration of the concept of indirect predator and prey species and the extent that the probability of extinction depended on the trophic level of the two species. The effect of deletions on the web itself was studied by searching for keystone species, whose removal caused a major restructuring of the community, and also by looking at the correlation between a number of food web properties (number of species, linkage density, fraction of omnivores, degree of cycling and redundancy) and the stability of the web to deletions. With the exception of redundancy, we found little or no correlation. In particular, we found no evidence that complexity in terms of increased species number or links per species is destabilising.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE cond-mat.stat-mech

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Christopher Quince, Paul Higgs, Alan McKane. 2004-01-27. Deleting species from model food webs. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0401037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Graph construction in QUBO-based recursive phylogenetic tree reconstruction

Molecular sequence data are used to reconstruct evolutionary relationships among taxa, but reconstruction accuracy depends not only on the tree-building method but also on how pairwise sequence relationships are represented. We evaluated sequence-to-affinity representations in a recursive normalized-cut (Ncut) framework whose graph-partitioning subproblems were formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models and solved using Simulated Bifurcation. Using simulated amino-acid and nucleotide datasets spanning multiple tree-generation settings and evolutionary divergence, we compared normalized bit-score affinities with representations derived from transformed sequence similarities and evolutionary distances, examined post-swap refinement, and used neighbor joining (NJ) as a distance-based comparator. Affinity representation substantially affected internal split recovery, particularly for nucleotide data. JC69-based local affinities maintained comparatively high accuracy as divergence increased, whereas normalized bit-score and BLAST-derived kernel representations declined more markedly. Post-swap refinement generally improved recovery, but not consistently across individual reconstructions. NJ achieved higher mean split recovery than corresponding recursive Ncut reconstructions for WAG and JC69 distances across all evaluated conditions, whereas recursive Ncut outperformed NJ for BLAST-derived logarithmic distances under some conditions. These results show that graph construction is an important determinant of recursive Ncut-based phylogenetic reconstruction. A representation that performs well within Ncut does not necessarily provide the most accurate use of the underlying pairwise distances. Pairwise representation, affinity transformation, optimization, and recursive tree construction should therefore be evaluated jointly.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

A conceptual predator-prey model with super-long transients

Drawing on the understanding of the logistic map, we propose a simple predator-prey model where predators and prey adapt to each other, leading to the co-evolution of the system. The special dynamics observed in periodic windows contribute to the coexistence of multiple time scales, adding to the complexity of the system. Typical dynamics in ecosystems, such as the persistence and coexistence of population cycles and chaotic behaviors, the emergence of super-long transients, regime shifts, and the quantifying of resilience, are encapsulated within this single model. The simplicity of our model allows for detailed analysis, reinforcing its potential as a conceptual tool for understanding ecosystems deeply.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

Mutation Order and Selection Shape Intratumor Heterogeneity in Tumor Evolution

Cancer progression often requires multiple driver mutations, but the same drivers may be acquired in different orders. How these pathways jointly shape tumor clonal structure remains unclear. We develop a multitype branching-process model in which malignant transformation requires two driver mutations, distinguishing malignant cells by mutation order and the independent transformation event that founded their clone. Under a successive exponential approximation, we establish point-process limits for pathway-specific clone sizes and derive a closed-form expression for the limiting expected Simpson's index of the combined malignant population. When both mutation orders yield malignant cells with the same net growth rate, the index decomposes into effective pathway weights, determined by mutation rates and birth-death dynamics at preceding stages, and within-pathway concentration terms, determined by intermediate-to-malignant growth-rate ratios. A driver's effect on heterogeneity thus depends critically on when it is acquired. A strong driver acquired early expands the intermediate lineage and increases the supply of independent malignant founders, whereas the same driver acquired last strengthens the growth and age advantage of early-founded malignant clones. Under additive fitness effects, these opposing mechanisms can produce a non-monotone relationship between selective advantage and clonal concentration. Threshold-like non-additive fitness effects can generate highly concentrated malignant populations, while order-dependent terminal fitness causes the faster-growing pathway to dominate asymptotically. These results show how mutation order, mutational accessibility, selection, and epistasis jointly determine lineage-level intratumor heterogeneity.

q-bio.PE↗