Ultimate limit to human longevity

Byung Mook Weon

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0404026

Ultimate limit to human longevity

Byung Mook Weon

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Are there limits to human longevity? We suggest a new demographic model to describe human demographic trajectories. Specifically, the model mathematically defines the limits of longevity. Through the demographic analysis of trends for Sweden (between 1751 and 2002), Switzerland (between 1876 and 2002) and Japan (between 1950 and 1999), which are the longest-lived countries, we would like to demonstrate whether or not there is the ultimate limit to longevity. We analyse the trends of new demographic indicators, the characteristic life and the shape parameter, and calculate the mathematical limits of longevity. We find out the surprising phenomenon that the mathematical limits of longevity decrease as the longevity tendency increases in recent decades. These paradoxical trends will be explained by the complementarity of longevity, which is attributable to the nature of biological systems for longevity. According to the regression analysis, the ultimate limit for humans is estimated to be approximately 124 years, which may be considered to be the biological limit for humans.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Byung Mook Weon. 2004-04-22. Ultimate limit to human longevity. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0404026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Graph construction in QUBO-based recursive phylogenetic tree reconstruction

Molecular sequence data are used to reconstruct evolutionary relationships among taxa, but reconstruction accuracy depends not only on the tree-building method but also on how pairwise sequence relationships are represented. We evaluated sequence-to-affinity representations in a recursive normalized-cut (Ncut) framework whose graph-partitioning subproblems were formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models and solved using Simulated Bifurcation. Using simulated amino-acid and nucleotide datasets spanning multiple tree-generation settings and evolutionary divergence, we compared normalized bit-score affinities with representations derived from transformed sequence similarities and evolutionary distances, examined post-swap refinement, and used neighbor joining (NJ) as a distance-based comparator. Affinity representation substantially affected internal split recovery, particularly for nucleotide data. JC69-based local affinities maintained comparatively high accuracy as divergence increased, whereas normalized bit-score and BLAST-derived kernel representations declined more markedly. Post-swap refinement generally improved recovery, but not consistently across individual reconstructions. NJ achieved higher mean split recovery than corresponding recursive Ncut reconstructions for WAG and JC69 distances across all evaluated conditions, whereas recursive Ncut outperformed NJ for BLAST-derived logarithmic distances under some conditions. These results show that graph construction is an important determinant of recursive Ncut-based phylogenetic reconstruction. A representation that performs well within Ncut does not necessarily provide the most accurate use of the underlying pairwise distances. Pairwise representation, affinity transformation, optimization, and recursive tree construction should therefore be evaluated jointly.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

A conceptual predator-prey model with super-long transients

Drawing on the understanding of the logistic map, we propose a simple predator-prey model where predators and prey adapt to each other, leading to the co-evolution of the system. The special dynamics observed in periodic windows contribute to the coexistence of multiple time scales, adding to the complexity of the system. Typical dynamics in ecosystems, such as the persistence and coexistence of population cycles and chaotic behaviors, the emergence of super-long transients, regime shifts, and the quantifying of resilience, are encapsulated within this single model. The simplicity of our model allows for detailed analysis, reinforcing its potential as a conceptual tool for understanding ecosystems deeply.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

Mutation Order and Selection Shape Intratumor Heterogeneity in Tumor Evolution

Cancer progression often requires multiple driver mutations, but the same drivers may be acquired in different orders. How these pathways jointly shape tumor clonal structure remains unclear. We develop a multitype branching-process model in which malignant transformation requires two driver mutations, distinguishing malignant cells by mutation order and the independent transformation event that founded their clone. Under a successive exponential approximation, we establish point-process limits for pathway-specific clone sizes and derive a closed-form expression for the limiting expected Simpson's index of the combined malignant population. When both mutation orders yield malignant cells with the same net growth rate, the index decomposes into effective pathway weights, determined by mutation rates and birth-death dynamics at preceding stages, and within-pathway concentration terms, determined by intermediate-to-malignant growth-rate ratios. A driver's effect on heterogeneity thus depends critically on when it is acquired. A strong driver acquired early expands the intermediate lineage and increases the supply of independent malignant founders, whereas the same driver acquired last strengthens the growth and age advantage of early-founded malignant clones. Under additive fitness effects, these opposing mechanisms can produce a non-monotone relationship between selective advantage and clonal concentration. Threshold-like non-additive fitness effects can generate highly concentrated malignant populations, while order-dependent terminal fitness causes the faster-growing pathway to dominate asymptotically. These results show how mutation order, mutational accessibility, selection, and epistasis jointly determine lineage-level intratumor heterogeneity.

q-bio.PE↗