Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · q-bio/0406003

The principal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins

Abstract

With the aim to study the relationship between protein sequences and their native structures, we adopt vectorial representations for both sequence and structure. The structural representation is based on the Principal Eigenvector of the fold's contact matrix (PE). As recently shown, the latter encodes sufficient information for reconstructing the whole contact matrix. The sequence is represented through a Hydrophobicity Profile (HP), using a generalized hydrophobicity scale that we obtain from the principal eigenvector of a residue-residue interaction matrix and denote it as interactivity scale. Using this novel scale, we define the optimal HP of a protein fold, and predict, by means of stability arguments, that it is strongly correlated with the PE of the fold's contact matrix. This prediction is confirmed through an evolutionary analysis, which shows that the PE correlates with the HP of each individual sequence adopting the same fold and, even more strongly, with the average HP of this set of sequences. Thus, protein sequences evolve in such a way that their average HP is close to the optimal one, implying that neutral evolution can be viewed as a kind of motion in sequence space around the optimal HP. Our results indicate that the correlation coefficient between N-dimensional vectors constitutes a natural metric in the vectorial space in which we represent both protein sequences and protein structures, which we call Vectorial Protein Space. In this way, we define a unified framework for sequence to sequence, sequence to structure, and structure to structure alignments. We show that the interactivity scale is nearly optimal both for the comparison of sequences with sequences and sequences with structures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ugo Bastolla, Markus Porto, H. Eduardo Roman, Michele Vendruscolo. 2004-06-01. The principal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0406003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Protein B-factor modeling with local magnitude

Topological magnitude characterizes the effective size and spatial organization of metric spaces, offering a geometric approach with potential applications in molecular biology and materials science. Previous work has demonstrated its utility in modeling protein flexibility from structure, but global magnitude weighting requires dense linear systems whose computational cost increases with protein size. We introduce a local magnitude representation that retains residue-level structural information through nearest-neighbor environments. The construction is well posed and geometrically invariant, with central weighting distinguished from scalar neighborhood magnitude. Across 364 proteins, the mean within-protein fitting Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) increases from 0.725 for global magnitude to 0.728 for local magnitude. Blind-prediction experiments on 345 proteins combine each representation with identical auxiliary descriptors and evaluate random forests and gradient boosting under three validation protocols. Local features improve the primary PCC in all six model--protocol comparisons, with a maximum absolute increase of 0.008 in protein-level ten-fold gradient boosting. For a fixed feature bank, local factorization costs $O(Nk^3)$ compared with $O(N^3)$ for global factorization, where $N$ is the number of C$_α$ atoms and $k$ the neighborhood size. Timing measurements show a computational advantage of local magnitude on large structures. Within the tested single-seed configuration and distinct global and local scale banks, these results support local magnitude as a compact representation that preserves useful B-factor information while reducing feature-extraction costs for large proteins.

q-bio.BM↗

Kinetic models of a K channel with 2 stage voltage sensor activation and an opening step

The activation of a K channel with 2 voltage sensors and a separate opening step may be described by a 4 state kinetic equation. If $k_{o}$ and $k_{c}$ are the opening and closing rates, and $α$ and $β$ are the voltage sensor rates such that $k_{o}$ $\ggα,k_{c}\ggβ$ and $k_{o}$ $\gg k_{c}$, the kinetic equation may be reduced to a 3 state model where the effective backward rate from the activated-open state is $2βk_{c}/(k_{o}+k_{c})$. However, if a K channel voltage sensor activates in 2 stages, and there is a separate opening step, the occupation probabilities of the states of the channel satisfy a 10 state kinetic equation. When the time constants of the characteristic equation for each voltage sensor differ by an order of magnitude, and $k_{o}$ $\gg k_{c}$, the open state probability is proportional to $n^{2}$, where $n$ satisfies a rate equation, and the derived rates have a similar voltage dependence to the rates $α_{n}$ and $β_{n}$ from voltage clamp data.

q-bio.BM↗

Predicting protein structures at any folding stage from sequence

Protein structure prediction has largely focused on native conformations, leaving the continuum of unfolded states, folding intermediates, and native structures difficult to access. We present FoldScape, a sequence-conditioned deep learning framework for generating protein conformational ensembles at specified folding fractions $Q$. Trained on approximately one million conformations from 10,000 protein sequences, FoldScape combines coarse-grained folding and all-atom mechanical-unfolding trajectories. It reconstructs three-dimensional $C_α$ chains through hierarchical sliding-window regressions of inter-residue distances, chain-level assembly, and a rectified-flow decoder. By conditioning on folding progress, FoldScape generates conformations from unfolded states through intermediates to native-state structures without protein-specific molecular dynamics at inference. In matched-sample comparisons, FoldScape achieves median conformational-space coverage of 0.989, 0.722, and 0.877 along radius of gyration, fraction of native contacts $Q$, and secondary-structure fraction, respectively, versus 0.05, 0.05, and 0.10 for seed-varied AlphaFold 3 ensembles. Coverage advantages are consistent across the evaluated proteins and robust to binning choices. Reconstruction accuracy remains approximately stable across the evaluated stages of a folding trajectory, and stride-one crop-and-superpose inference extends predictions to chains several times longer than the single-pass limit. Analyses of mechanical-unfolding trajectories show residue-resolved pathways, reproducible extension-conditioned observables across pulling velocities, and geometrically coherent segments in partially unfolded chains. FoldScape extends sequence-based structure prediction beyond a single folded endpoint to controllable conformational-ensemble generation across protein folding.

q-bio.BM↗