Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0412017

A double-deletion method to quantifying incremental binding energies in proteins from experiment. Example of a destabilizing hydrogen bonding pair

Luis A. Campos·Santiago Cuesta-Lopez·Jon Lopez-Llano·Fernando Falo·Javier Sancho
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The contribution of a specific hydrogen bond in apoflavodoxin to protein stability is investigated by combining theory, experiment and simulation. Although hydrogen bonds are major determinants of protein structure and function, their contribution to protein stability is still unclear and widely debated. The best method so far devised to estimate the contribution of side-chain interactions to protein stability is double-mutant-cycle analysis, but the interaction energies so derived are not identical to incremental binding energies (the energies quantifying net contributions of two interacting groups to protein stability). Here we introduce double-deletion analysis of isolated residue pairs as a means to precisely quantify incremental binding. The method is exemplified by studying a surface-exposed hydrogen bond in a model protein (Asp96/Asn128 in apoflavodoxin). Combined substitution of these residues by alanines slightly destabilizes the protein, due to a decrease in hydrophobic surface burial. Subtraction of this effect, however, clearly indicates that the hydrogen-bonded groups in fact destabilize the native conformation. In addition, Molecular Dynamics simulations and classic double-mutant-cycle analysis explain quantitatively that, due to frustration, the hydrogen bond must form in the native structure because, when the two groups get approximated upon folding their binding becomes favorable. We would like to remark two facts: that this is the first time the contribution of a specific hydrogen bond to protein stability has been measured from experiment, and that more hydrogen bonds need to be analyzed in order to draw general conclusions on protein hydrogen bonds energetics. To that end, the double deletion method should be of help.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.BMq-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luis A. Campos, Santiago Cuesta-Lopez, Jon Lopez-Llano, Fernando Falo, Javier Sancho. 2004-12-09. A double-deletion method to quantifying incremental binding energies in proteins from experiment. Example of a destabilizing hydrogen bonding pair. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.050203

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

PocketVE: Stable and Property-Guided Structure-Based Drug Design with Variance-Exploding Diffusion

Protein-conditioned 3D molecule generation is a central challenge in structure-based drug design, requiring a balance between pocket compatibility, molecular properties, and physical geometry. We propose \textbf{PocketVE}, a protein-pocket-conditioned variance-exploding (VE) diffusion framework that couples stable coordinate denoising with inference-time property guidance. Specifically, PocketVE combines an EDM-style training and sampling setup for 3D denoising, classifier-free guidance for multi-property steering without external property classifiers, and adaptive protein perturbation as a training-time pocket regularizer. Evaluated on CrossDocked2020 under the GenBench3D protocol, PocketVE improves Valid$_{3\text{D}}$ from 58.6 to 80.6 and reduces strain energy from 457.4 to 127.9 relative to its TAGMol architectural baseline, while retaining competitive docking and molecular-property scores under moderate guidance. A guidance-scale study shows that moderate guidance gives a favorable balance between target-related objectives and geometric quality, whereas stronger guidance can degrade geometry and distributional fidelity. Pocket-permutation and PoseCheck diagnostics further support pocket-specific spatial compatibility with reduced steric conflicts. Overall, the results suggest that geometric stability and inference-time property guidance should be considered as coupled design objectives.

q-bio.BM↗
arXiv2026

In Vivo Length Distributions as Mechanistic Fingerprints of Pathological Protein Aggregation

Modern imaging techniques can resolve individual pathological protein aggregates in postmortem human samples, providing detailed measurements of aggregate size distributions that are inaccessible with conventional bulk approaches. These distributions represent mechanistic fingerprints of the microscopic processes that generated the observed pathology, but extracting this mechanistic information requires a quantitative theoretical framework. Here, we develop the mathematical tools needed to interpret aggregate length distributions in living systems, where aggregate growth competes with active removal. We show that, across a class of models, the length distribution of sufficiently large aggregates approaches a geometric decay. Crucially, the decay rate is determined by the balance between aggregate elongation and removal, providing a direct quantitative readout of these competing processes from a single time point measurement. This enables mechanistic comparisons between healthy and diseased human samples without requiring longitudinal measurements of aggregate dynamics. We further analyse how additional aggregation and removal processes modify the observed length distributions. Together, these results establish the mathematical foundations and tools to use aggregate length distributions as an experimentally accessible route for inferring microscopic aggregation dynamics directly from human tissue.

q-bio.BM↗
arXiv2026

Decoding enzyme-substrate interaction topology reveals principles underlying catalytic efficiency and mutational outcomes

The enzyme turnover number (kcat) defines catalytic efficiency and constrains quantitative models of metabolism, yet the molecular determinants governing kcat and its response to mutation remain poorly understood. Measurements are sparse and labor-intensive, and most computational approaches provide numerical predictions without explaining how enzyme-substrate interactions shape catalytic outcomes. A central challenge is therefore to identify the topological principles that determine where mutations act and how their functional outcomes are encoded within the enzyme-substrate interaction network. Here, we show that catalytic efficiency and mutational effects can be interpreted through enzyme-substrate interaction topology. We developed Interkcat, an interpretable bidirectional cross-attention framework that captures reciprocal coordination between protein residues and substrate atoms. Optimized on a unified benchmark, Interkcat achieves state-of-the-art predictive performance (R2 = 0.701). From its learned representations, we derive an Interaction Topology Score (ITS) that identifies sequence regions statistically enriched for mutation-sensitive sites without explicit structural inputs. We further demonstrate that higher-order topological features distinguish opposing mutational outcomes: lethal mutations disrupt coordinated networks, whereas activity-preserving or enhancing mutations retain sparse, globally organized coupling. These findings establish interaction topology as a unifying principle linking enzyme sequence, catalytic efficiency, and evolutionary perturbation.

q-bio.BM↗