Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0510024

Effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of comparative studies using microarrays

Shu-Dong Zhang·Timothy W. Gant
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many biomedical experiments are carried out by pooling individual biological samples. However, pooling samples can potentially hide biological variance and give false confidence concerning the data significance. In the context of microarray experiments for detecting differentially expressed genes, recent publications have addressed the problem of the efficiency of sample-pooling, and some approximate formulas were provided for the power and sample size calculations. It is desirable to have exact formulas for these calculations and have the approximate results checked against the exact ones. We show that the difference between the approximate and exact results can be large. In this study, we have characterized quantitatively the effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of microarray experiments for the detection of differential gene expression between two classes. We present exact formulas for calculating the power of microarray experimental designs involving sample pooling and technical replications. The formulas can be used to determine the total numbers of arrays and biological subjects required in an experiment to achieve the desired power at a given significance level. The conditions under which pooled design becomes preferable to non-pooled design can then be derived given the unit cost associated with a microarray and that with a biological subject. This paper thus serves to provide guidance on sample pooling and cost effectiveness. The formulation in this paper is outlined in the context of performing microarray comparative studies, but its applicability is not limited to microarray experiments. It is also applicable to a wide range of biomedical comparative studies where sample pooling may be involved.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.QMq-bio.GN

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shu-Dong Zhang, Timothy W. Gant. 2005-10-13. Effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of comparative studies using microarrays. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2Fbti717

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Multimodal AI predicts clinical outcomes of drug combinations from preclinical data

Predicting clinical outcomes from preclinical data is essential for selecting safe and effective drug combinations and for reducing late-stage failures. AI models use molecular structure and target annotations, and do not leverage the perturbation readouts that report how a compound acts in a cellular context. Here we introduce Madrigal, a multimodal AI model that learns from structural, pathway, cell-viability, and transcriptomic data. Madrigal aligns these modalities across 21,842 compounds into a shared latent space and predicts combination outcomes even for drugs observed in only a subset of the data modalities. Trained on 158 expert-curated and 795 patient-reported combination outcomes, Madrigal outperforms single-modality and state-of-the-art multimodal methods. Ablations show that modality alignment and multimodal input each improve predictive performance. Madrigal predicts elevated risk for combinations that share membrane transporters. In head-to-head trials that compare two combination arms,the arm with the higher observed incidence of neutropenia, anemia, alopecia, or hypoglycemia receives the higher predicted risk in 25 of 28 comparisons. In MASH, Madrigal ranks resmetirom among the candidates with favorable predicted safety when paired with type 2 diabetes drugs. Madrigal also improves adverse-event prediction in a longitudinal patient cohort and an independent oncology cohort and predicts efficacy in primary acute myeloid leukemia samples and patient-derived xenografts.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

ProteoEM: probabilistic protein abundance estimation from iterative affinity traces

Single-molecule affinity mapping enables molecular-level measurement of proteins and proteoforms, but imperfect and nonspecific probe binding makes individual affinity traces compatible with multiple molecular identities. Accurate abundance estimation therefore requires apportionment of ambiguous traces by weight rather than assignment to a single candidate. We developed ProteoEM, an expectation-maximization framework for weighted proteoform quantification, inspired by transcript abundance estimation methods for RNA sequencing and released as an open-source Python package. ProteoEM evaluates each molecule against every candidate using fixed, pre-calibrated probe-response rates held separate from the abundance estimate, while retaining the full likelihood of the observed affinity features. The framework estimates proteoform abundances, reports indistinguishable proteoforms as groups when measurements cannot separate them, and accounts for differential observation yields to distinguish the composition of observed molecules from that of the source sample. In simulations, ProteoEM accurately recovered the underlying molecular composition where approaches that reduce each trace to a hard yes/no call introduced substantial errors. ProteoEM's performance was insensitive to a moderate, uniform calibration error but was biased by informative missing data and by proteoforms absent from the reference. When observation yields were known, it also recovered source-sample composition from observed molecular counts. ProteoEM provides an open-source, reproducible framework for quantitative analysis of single-molecule affinity measurements, and these results motivate validation on experimental molecule-level data.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

PRAXIS-VirtualCell: A Programmable and Trustworthy Framework for Agentic Virtual Cell Experiments

Virtual cells are evolving from single-task predictive models toward programmable biological simulation systems, yet heterogeneous data, models, and validation evidence still lack a unified organizational framework. Here, we present PRAXIS-VirtualCell, a modular framework that organizes biological data, predictive models, perturbations, adapters, execution environments, and validation evidence to enable reproducible and auditable virtual experiments. The system supports cross-species tasks spanning Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and human K562 cells, while using biological contracts and evidence-aware execution to distinguish supported predictions from extrapolation and abstention. By further integrating agentic orchestration, PRAXIS-VirtualCell automatically translates natural-language questions into traceable virtual experiments, providing a unified runtime foundation for trustworthy and scalable Virtual Cell systems.

q-bio.QM↗