The promoters of human cell cycle genes integrate signals from two tumor suppressive pathways during cellular transformation

Yuval Tabach; Michael Milyavsky; Igor Shats; Ran Brosh; Or Zuk; Assif Yitzhaky; Roberto Mantovani; Eytan Domany; Varda Rotter Yitzhak Pilpel

arXiv · q-bio/0511022

The promoters of human cell cycle genes integrate signals from two tumor suppressive pathways during cellular transformation

Yuval Tabach·Michael Milyavsky·Igor Shats·Ran Brosh·Or Zuk·Assif Yitzhaky·Roberto Mantovani·Eytan Domany·Varda Rotter Yitzhak Pilpel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Deciphering regulatory events that drive malignant transformation represents a major challenge for systems biology. Here we analyzed genome-wide transcription profiling of an in-vitro transformation process. We focused on a cluster of genes whose expression levels increased as a function of p53 and p16INK4A tumor suppressors inactivation. This cluster predominantly consists of cell cycle genes and constitutes a signature of a diversity of cancers. By linking expression profiles of the genes in the cluster with the dynamic behavior of p53 and p16INK4A, we identified a promoter architecture that integrates signals from the two tumor suppressive channels and that maps their activity onto distinct levels of expression of the cell cycle genes, which in turn, correspond to different cellular proliferation rates. Taking components of the mitotic spindle as an example, we experimentally verified our predictions that p53-mediated transcriptional repression of several of these novel targets is dependent on the activities of p21, NFY and E2F. Our study demonstrates how a well-controlled transformation process allows linking between gene expression, promoter architecture and activity of upstream signaling molecules.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.MN q-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yuval Tabach, Michael Milyavsky, Igor Shats, Ran Brosh, Or Zuk, Assif Yitzhaky, Roberto Mantovani, Eytan Domany, Varda Rotter Yitzhak Pilpel. 2005-11-15. The promoters of human cell cycle genes integrate signals from two tumor suppressive pathways during cellular transformation. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0511022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Accelerating reaction network identification via frequency-domain analysis

The identification of intracellular reaction networks from single-cell data lies at the heart of many biological studies, as it can unravel key mechanisms in living organisms and provide insights for their rational engineering. However, the stochastic and nonlinear nature of these reacting systems poses significant challenges for this identification problem, making the state-of-the-art methods (e.g., particle-filtering-based approaches) computationally demanding. This paper reports a noteworthy numerical observation that for certain systems, the Fourier transform can render the likelihood of the measurement data approximately Gaussian, therefore resulting in a substantially accelerated Bayesian inference algorithm. A gene transcription example is presented to illustrate this finding and demonstrate the efficiency of {the proposed Fourier-based method}.

q-bio.MN↗

arXiv2026

Can a self-sustaining chemical network emerge due to just a few catalysts?

Understanding how self-sustaining chemical reaction networks can emerge from simple molecules is an important question in chemical approaches to the origin of life. Reflexively autocatalytic and food-generated (RAF) sets provide a mathematical framework for investigating this question. This line of research goes back to the early work of Kauffman on autocatalytic reaction networks and was subsequently developed through the probabilistic framework of Mossel and Steel. Further contributions by Hordijk, Steel, and collaborators extended the theory to more heterogeneous forms of catalysis, including reaction-dependent probabilities or power-law distributions of catalytic activity. We introduce a stochastic model that combines heterogeneous molecular catalytic activity with reaction-dependent molecule-reaction compatibility. By assigning random catalytic weights to molecules and incorporating compatibility through an explicit formulation of catalysis probabilities, our model provides a concrete and flexible setting that captures both sources of heterogeneity while remaining mathematically tractable. We establish novel and general criteria for RAF formation and nonformation. We further demonstrate that classical phase-transition criteria need not remain valid in the presence of reaction-dependent catalysis. For heavy-tailed catalytic weights, we identify and rigorously quantify an additional phase transition. In models with finite-mean catalytic weights, RAF formation and nonformation are governed by a catalytic intensity parameter. For infinite-mean weights, however, we show that RAFs may emerge with probability tending to one even when the catalytic intensity parameter tends to zero.

q-bio.MN↗

arXiv2026

Modeling Gene Expression Noise: From Transcriptional Dynamics to Cell Growth and Division

Gene expression is inherently noisy, leading to substantial cell-to-cell variation in mRNA and protein levels. The telegraph model and the simpler bursty model provide good fits to single-cell count distributions and have been used extensively to understand transcriptional kinetics and estimate the kinetic parameters. However, these models all describe a static cell. Here, we review models of stochastic gene expression in growing and dividing cells which aim to understand how a cell's own life history, from its birth, through copying its genome, to its division, leaves a distinct fluctuation signature on molecule numbers. We discuss the biochemical and biophysical processes captured by these models, their analytical tractability, the concept of cyclo-stationary behavior, when this is well approximated by the steady-state of static models and how the distributions of molecular numbers measured under these conditions sensitively depend on the experimental setup. This is followed by a discussion of how these models are fitted to single-cell measurements, how biological variability can be separated from measurement noise, and which computational advances make this feasible for thousands of genes. We finish by highlighting the open problems in the field.

q-bio.MN↗