Search arXivSearch

arXiv · quant-ph/0505036

Entanglement on mixed stabiliser states--I: Normal Forms and Reduction Procedures

Abstract

The stabiliser formalism allows the efficient description of a sizeable class of pure as well as mixed quantum states of N-qubit systems. That same formalism has important applications in the field of quantum error correcting codes, where mixed stabiliser states correspond to projectors on subspaces associated with stabiliser codes. Here, we derive efficient reduction procedures to obtain various useful normal forms for stabiliser states. We explicitly prove that these procedures will always converge to the correct result and that these procedures are efficient in that they only require a polynomial number of operations on the generators of the stabilisers. We obtain two single-party normal forms. The simplest, the row-reduced echelon form, is useful to calculate partial traces of stabiliser states. The second is the fully reduced form and allows for the efficient calculation of the overlap between two stabiliser states, as well as of the Uhlmann fidelity between them, and their Bures distance. We also find a reduction procedure of bipartite stabiliser states, where the operations involved are restricted to be local ones. Using this two-party normal form, we prove that every bipartite mixed stabiliser state is locally equivalent to a direct product of a number of maximally entangled states and a separable state. Using this normal form we can efficiently calculate every reasonable bipartite entanglement measure of mixed stabiliser states.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Koenraad M. R. Audenaert, Martin B. Plenio. 2005-09-01. Entanglement on mixed stabiliser states--I: Normal Forms and Reduction Procedures. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630%2F7%2F1%2F170

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Lie-Algebraic Bounds on Quantum Control Time via the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff Formula

The time required to implement a desired unitary operation is a central issue in quantum control, especially for many-body systems with limited control access. While controllability theory determines whether a target unitary is reachable in principle, it does not directly quantify the implementation time. Here we derive a Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff (BCH)-based inequality that connects these two questions at the operator level. Whenever a target unitary is implemented by the available Hamiltonians, an effective logarithmic generator can be chosen within the corresponding dynamical Lie algebra, and its normalized traceless Hilbert-Schmidt norm is bounded by the time integral of the same norm of the applied Hamiltonian. This induces a global-phase-insensitive distance on the reachable subgroup and yields a protocol-independent lower bound on the control time that explicitly respects Lie-algebraic restrictions. We compare the resulting bound with familiar quantum-speed-limit estimates and show that it refines a stabilizer-based control-time bound for an XY spin chain in the single-excitation subspace. Our result thus provides an algebraic link between controllability and quantitative bounds on unitary implementation time.

quant-ph

Strict hierarchy between $n$-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility

The incompatibility of quantum measurements, i.e. the fact that certain observable quantities cannot be measured jointly is widely regarded as a distinctive quantum feature with important implications for the foundations and the applications of quantum information theory. While the standard incompatibility of multiple measurements has been the focus of attention since the inception of quantum theory, its generalizations, such as measurement simulability, $n$-wise incompatibility, and mulit-copy incompatibility have only been proposed recently. Here, we point out that all these generalizations are differing notions of the question of how many measurements are genuinely contained in a measurement device. We then show, that all notions do differ not only in their operational meaning but also mathematically in the set of measurement assemblages they describe. We then fully resolve the relations between these different generalizations, by showing a strict hierarchy between these notions. Hence, we provide a general framework for generalized measurement incompatibility. Finally, we consider the implications our results have for recent works using these different notions.

quant-ph

SPARSE: Scattering Poles and Amplitudes from Radial Schrödinger Equations

We introduce an algorithm for the solution of a system of radial Schrödinger equations describing the inelastic scattering of particles with spin in a partial wave with definite total angular momentum. The system of differential equations is approximated as an ordinary linear nonhomogeneous system using the finite difference method. Dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed at the origin and at an arbitrary large radius. The numerical wavefunction is calculated using LAPACK general banded LU decomposition routines. The $K$-matrix for physical energies is calculated from the numerical solutions of the system by least-square fit to the analytical real solutions at large distances. The scattering amplitudes for physical energies is then calculated from the $K$-matrix. Scattering poles in the lower half of the unphysical Riemann sheet are calculated by numerical extrapolation of the scattering amplitudes using the AAA algorithm for rational approximation.

quant-ph