Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

A. Mayeux

Publications and source records attributed to A. Mayeux.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Projective blowups: a formal and multicentered proof

We give a machine-checked proof, in Lean 4, of the universal property of multicentered blowups: given a finite family $Z$ of closed subschemes of a scheme $X$, presented on each chart by ideals, there is a scheme $\Bl_Z X$ over $X$, terminal among $X$-schemes on which every member of the family becomes an effective Cartier divisor. To the best of our knowledge this is the first formalisation of blowups, single- or multicentered, in any theorem prover. The proof is organised around the universal property of the multicentered dilatation of a ring: the initial algebra in which a finite family of ideals becomes generated by non-zero-divisors. Existence and uniqueness of the dilatation are established locally, on affine charts, and every subsequent step of the construction, the base change along open immersions, the comparison isomorphisms on overlaps, the triple overlap maps, the cocycle identity, and the independence of the chosen presentation, is deduced from that single local property by uniqueness alone. We give the exact theorem statement as formalized, the proof architecture, and the main new mathematical ingredients, together with the corresponding Lean code.

math.AG↗

Towards a Bridge Layer Between Bibliographic and Formalized Mathematical Knowledge

Mathematical knowledge is split between bibliographic databases (e.g., MathSciNet, zbMATH Open) and formal proof libraries (e.g., Lean's mathlib), preventing unified access to published results and their formalizations. We propose a relational bridge-database that aligns publication metadata with formal artifacts, providing an interoperability layer between mathematical literature and machine-verifiable proofs. We introduce a paper-level formalization score that measures how much of a publication is covered in formal systems, together with a correctness profile recording what machine verification has established about each printed statement: certified, corrected, uncorrected, open, or untested. As a feasibility study, we show how such scores can be estimated via cross-document alignment between informal texts and Lean formalizations, enabling large-scale analysis of formalization coverage. We further outline a concrete construction pathway: multi-source scoring over heterogeneous formalization artifacts, an agentic collection workflow with direct author submission, a dual validation policy, algorithmic then human, and a global formalization score of indexed mathematics. This framework is a step toward integrating bibliographic and formal mathematical ecosystems.

cs.DL↗

The set of primes is supernatural: a Lean formalization of the statement of the conjecture

The paper \emph{Conjecture: the set of prime numbers is supernatural} conjectures that no non-constant function built from the identity and constants by finitely many pointwise additions, multiplications, and exponentiations maps every positive integer to a prime. We give a complete Lean~4 formalization of that paper over Mathlib: every definition, example, remark, numbered result, and experimental table row has a machine-checked counterpart, with no \lcode{sorry}. The conjecture and similar generalizations are stated exactly, as named open problems. So stated, the conjecture becomes a precise target: an automated reasoning system can now attempt a kernel-checked proof.

cs.LO↗

Formalizing all indexed mathematics as a benchmark for general reasoning, with the example of implementing dilatations of categories

Formal rigor distinguishes mathematics from other disciplines, in the sense that mathematical statements are derived from explicit axioms by logically verifiable steps. Interactive theorem provers support this by expressing definitions, theorems, and proofs in a fully formal language and verifying them mechanically. We consider the benchmark problem of formalizing all published mathematics as a machine verifiable and continuously updated corpus of mathematical knowledge. This viewpoint treats mathematics as a structured database of interdependent results and raises questions about scalability and organization of large formal libraries. As a case study, we present an ongoing formalization in categorical algebra, namely dilatations of categories, extending classical localizations and illustrating what such an implementation looks like in practice.

cs.DB↗