Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Abdelkarim Kati

Publications and source records attributed to Abdelkarim Kati.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

SilentWood: Efficient Private Inference Over Gradient-Boosting Decision Forests

Gradient boosting decision forests, used by XGBoost or AdaBoost, offer higher accuracy and lower training times than decision trees on large datasets. Private inference protocols for decision trees can preserve both input and tree privacy. However, naively extending them to decision forests by replication leads to impractical running times. In this paper, we propose an efficient private decision inference protocol using homomorphic encryption. We present several optimizations that identify and remove (approximate) duplication between trees, significantly reducing communication and computation costs over the naive approach. We present the private inference protocol for highly scalable gradient boosting decision forests. Our protocol SilentWood is faster than parallel RCC-PDTE by up to 42.5x, Zama's Concrete ML XGBoost by up to 27.8x, and SoK-GGG's two-party garbled circuit protocol by 2.94x.

cs.CR↗

Private Data Imputation

Data imputation is an important data preparation task where the data analyst replaces missing or erroneous values to increase the expected accuracy of downstream analyses. The accuracy improvement of data imputation extends to private data analyses across distributed databases. However, existing data imputation methods violate the privacy of the data rendering the privacy protection in the downstream analyses obsolete. We conclude that private data analysis requires private data imputation. In this paper, we present the first optimized protocols for private data imputation. We consider the case of horizontally and vertically split data sets. Our optimization aims to reduce most of the computation to private set intersection (or at least oblivious programmable pseudo-random function) protocols which can be very efficiently computed. We show that private data imputation has -- on average across all evaluated datasets -- an accuracy advantage of 20\% in case of vertically split data and 5\% in case of horizontally split data over imputing data locally. In case of the worst data split we observed that imputing using our method resulted in an increase of up to 32.7 times in the quality of imputation over the vertically split data and 3.4 times in case of horizontally split data. Our protocols are very efficient and run in 2.4 seconds in case of vertically split data and 8.4 seconds in case of horizontally split data for 100,000 records evaluated in the 10 Gbps network setting, performing one data imputation.

cs.CR↗