Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Adeesh Desai

Publications and source records attributed to Adeesh Desai.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

ContactWorld: What Representations Matter for Vision-Tactile Latent World Models in Contact-Rich Manipulation

Contact-rich manipulation poses a fundamental challenge for world models: visual and tactile observations capture different aspects of physical interaction, and their utility depends critically on how this information is represented. We introduce ContactWorld, a controlled benchmark and empirical study of vision-tactile representations across 12 contact-rich manipulation tasks. Using a fixed world-model architecture, training procedure, and planning framework, we examine representation effects through three complementary properties: spatial fidelity, motion coherence, and predictive stability. Point clouds preserve task-relevant geometry and track physical motion more reliably than image observations, helping explain their higher average planning success of 32.1%, compared with 20.7% and 22.0% for wrist- and front-view RGB, respectively. Tactile observations generally reduce long-horizon prediction-error accumulation, but these gains do not translate uniformly into task success. Structured tactile force fields provide the most consistent downstream improvements, with PointCloud+TacFF achieving the highest overall simulated success rate of 36.1%. We further validate these trends through 900 physical trials spanning six tasks, two robot platforms, and three tactile sensing systems. Together, ContactWorld identifies sensory representation as a central design factor in vision--tactile world models and provides empirical guidance for predictive planning in contact-rich manipulation.

cs.RO↗

CONTACT: CONtact-aware TACTile Learning for Robotic Disassembly

Robotic disassembly involves contact-rich interactions in which successful manipulation depends not only on geometric alignment but also on force-dependent state transitions. While vision-based policies perform well in structured settings, their reliability often degrades in tight-tolerance, contact-dominated, or deformable scenarios. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of tactile sensing in robotic disassembly through both simulation and real-world experiments. We construct five rigid-body disassembly tasks in simulation with increasing geometric constraints and extraction difficulty. We further design five real-world tasks, including three rigid and two deformable scenarios, to evaluate contact-dependent manipulation. Within a unified learning framework, we compare three sensing configurations: Vision Only, Vision + tactile RGB (TacRGB), and Vision + tactile force field (TacFF). Across both simulation and real-world experiments, TacFF-based policies consistently achieve the highest success rates, with particularly notable gains in contact-dependent and deformable settings. Notably, naive fusion of TacRGB and TacFF underperforms either modality alone, indicating that simple concatenation can dilute task-relevant force information. Our results show that tactile sensing plays a critical, task-dependent role in robotic disassembly, with structured force-field representations being particularly effective in contact-dominated scenarios.

cs.RO↗

Imagining the Sense of Touch: Touch-Informed Manipulation via Imagined Tactile Representations

Tactile sensing can substantially improve contact-rich robotic manipulation, yet its practical deployment remains limited by the fragility, calibration requirements, and maintenance burden of tactile hardware. This raises a fundamental question: can robots benefit from tactile knowledge without requiring tactile sensors at deployment? We present TacImag, a tactile imagination framework that predicts tactile observations from vision and proprioception and uses the generated signals to guide manipulation policies. Trained from paired visuotactile demonstrations, TacImag enables touch-informed manipulation using only visual observations at test time. We evaluate TacImag on six simulated and four real-world manipulation tasks. Across simulation and real-world experiments, imagined tactile observations consistently improve manipulation performance without requiring tactile hardware. In real-world experiments, imagined force fields improve contact-sensitive tasks by 44.4% on average, whereas imagined tactile images improve texture-sensitive tasks by 23.3%, revealing that the effectiveness of tactile imagination depends strongly on the relationship between tactile representation and task requirements. Our results further suggest that tactile imagination does not simply recover missing tactile measurements. Instead, it acts as a form of contact-aware supervision that transforms subtle visual interaction cues into representations that are easier for manipulation policies to exploit.

cs.RO↗