arXiv subjects

Anthony Freeman

Publications and source records attributed to Anthony Freeman.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Planetary Exploration 3.0: A Roadmap for Software-Defined, Radically Adaptive Space Systems

The surface and subsurface of worlds beyond Mars remain largely unexplored. Yet these worlds hold keys to fundamental questions in planetary science - from potentially habitable subsurface oceans on icy moons to ancient records preserved in Kuiper Belt objects. NASA's success in Mars exploration was achieved through incrementalism: 22 progressively sophisticated missions over decades. This paradigm, which we call Planetary Exploration 2.0 (PE 2.0), is untenable for the outer Solar System, where cruise times of a decade or more make iterative missions infeasible. We propose Planetary Exploration 3.0 (PE 3.0): a paradigm in which unvisited worlds are explored by a single or a few missions with radically adaptive space systems. A PE 3.0 mission conducts both initial exploratory science and follow-on hypothesis-driven science based on its own in situ data returns, evolving spacecraft capabilities to work resiliently in previously unseen environments. The key enabler of PE 3.0 is software-defined space systems (SDSSs) - systems that can adapt their functions at all levels through software updates. This paper presents findings from a Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) workshop on PE 3.0, covering: (1) PE 3.0 systems engineering including science definition, architecture, design methods, and verification & validation; (2) software-defined space system technologies including reconfigurable hardware, multi-functionality, and modularity; (3) onboard intelligence including autonomous science, navigation, controls, and embodied AI; and (4) three PE 3.0 mission concepts: a Neptune/Triton smart flyby, an ocean world explorer, and an Oort cloud reconnaissance mission.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2023

Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report Chapter 5: Enabling technologies for planetary exploration

The main objective of this chapter is to present an overview of the different areas of key technologies that will be needed to fly the technically most challenging of the representative missions identified in chapter 4 (the Pillar 2 Horizon 2061 report). It starts with a description of the future scientific instruments which will address the key questions of Horizon 2061 described in chapter 3 (the Pillar 1 Horizon 2061 report) and the new technologies that the next generations of space instruments will require (section 2). From there, the chapter follows the line of logical development and implementation of a planetary mission: section 3 describes some of the novel mission architectures that will be needed and how they will articulate interplanetary spacecraft and science platforms; section 4 summarizes the system-level technologies needed: power, propulsion, navigation, communication, advanced autonomy on board planetary spacecraft; section 5 describes the diversity of specialized science platforms that will be needed to survive, operate and return scientific data from the extreme environments that future missions will target; section 6 describes the new technology developments that will be needed for long-duration missions and semi-permanent settlements; finally, section 7 attempts to anticipate on the disruptive technologies that should emerge and progressively prevail in the decades to come to meet the long-term needs of future planetary missions.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2019

Astro2020 APC White Paper: SmallSats for Astrophysics

The commercial SmallSat industry is booming and has developed numerous low-cost, capable satellite buses. SmallSats can be used as vehicles for technology development or to host science missions. Missions hosted on SmallSats can answer specific science questions that are difficult or impossible to answer with larger facilities, can be developed relatively quickly, serve to train engineering and scientists, and provide access to space for small institutions. SmallSats complement larger Astrophysics missions and allow the broader community to test new ideas at the bottom of the market, creating new capabilities which find their way to larger missions. Currently, NASA Astrophysics does not provide flight opportunities that would allow technology maturation of instrument systems or concepts of operations. Without flight opportunities to mature technologies, missions hosted on SmallSats are likely to be considered high risk, and face long odds being selected for implementation. Our primary suggestion is that NASA decouples science and technology for SmallSats by creating a technology-based SmallSat AO, modeled after the Earth Sciences InVEST call. Such AO would help reduce the new technology risk for science missions of any size. We also suggest that NASA provides additional science-driven SmallSat opportunities at the ~$12M funding level, provides access to new launchers free of charge to proposers, and re-structures the solicitation AOs so that SmallSats do not compete with other mission classes such as balloons.

astro-ph.IM↗