arXiv subjects

Bingkai Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Bingkai Lin.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

On the Approximability of Parameterized Minimum Monotone Satisfying Assignment

The parameterized Minimum Monotone Satisfying Assignment ($k$-MMSA) problem asks whether a monotone Boolean circuit admits a satisfying assignment of Hamming weight at most $k$. The MMSA hierarchy is defined by allowing a bounded number of alternations between AND and OR gates in the circuit. While the polynomial-time approximability of the MMSA hierarchy has been studied extensively, much less is known in the parameterized setting. In particular, $k$-MMSA$_2$ is the well-known $k$-SetCover problem, whose parameterized inapproximability lies in the $\text{polylog}(n)$ regime. In contrast, $k$-MMSA$_4$ captures $k$-MinLabel, for which known lower bounds give $\text{poly}(n)$ inapproximability. Sandwiched by $k$-MMSA$_2$ and $k$-MMSA$_4$, the inapproximability of $k$-MMSA$_3$ remained comparatively unexplored. In this paper, we give an FPT-time $O(2^k \log n)$-approximation algorithm for $k$-MMSA$_3$, suggesting that in the fixed-parameter regime, the third level of MMSA remains surprisingly close to the second level. Complementing this algorithm, we also give an FPT-time gap-preserving reduction from $k$-MMSA$_3$ to $k$-MMSA$_2$. Thus, stronger inapproximability for $k$-MMSA$_3$ would imply new hardness for $k$-MMSA$_2$, potentially offering a route around the current barriers for the latter problem. Revisiting Marx's reduction from $k$-MMSA$_t$ to gap $k$-MMSA$_{t+2}$, we also show that $k$-MMSA$_4$ admits no $n^{o(1)}$-factor FPT approximation unless W[2]=FPT, and no $n^{O(1/k)}$-factor approximation running in $n^{o(k)}$ time under ETH. These results separate the parameterized approximability behavior of the third and fourth levels and clarify where stronger inapproximability enters the $k$-MMSA hierarchy.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Tight Lower Bound for Approximating Parametrized Maximum Likelihood Decoding under ETH

We present a simple deterministic reduction which, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis ($\mathsf{ETH}$), yields tight lower bounds for approximating the parameterized Maximum Likelihood Decoding problem ($\mathsf{MLD}$) and the parameterized Nearest Codeword Problem ($\mathsf{NCP}$) within some fixed constant factor. Our starting point is the ETH-based exponential-time hardness of $(c,s)$-Gap-$\mathsf{MAXLIN}$ established in [BHI+24]. We transform a $(c,s)$-Gap-$\mathsf{MAXLIN}$ instance into an instance of $\gamma$-Gap $k$-$\mathsf{MLD}$ via a novel combinatorial object that we call a cover family. We provide both a randomized construction of the required cover families and a subsequent derandomization. Prior to our work, $n^{\Omega(k)}$ hardness for constant-factor approximation was only shown under the randomized Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis Gap-$\mathsf{ETH}$ [Man20], which is a much stronger assumption than $\mathsf{ETH}$. Under $\mathsf{ETH}$, the strongest known lower bound was $n^{\Omega(k/\operatorname{poly} \log k)}$ due to [BKM25]. Unlike previous approaches that rely on reductions from the hardness of approximating $2$-$\mathsf{CSP}$, our reduction provides a more direct and conceptually simpler route to achieving the optimal lower bounds.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Almost Optimal Time Lower Bound for Approximating Parameterized Clique, CSP, and More, under ETH

The Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH), which is an analog of the PCP theorem in parameterized complexity, asserts that, there is a constant $\varepsilon> 0$ such that for any computable function $f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$, no $f(k)\cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm can, on input a $k$-variable CSP instance with domain size $n$, find an assignment satisfying $1-\varepsilon$ fraction of the constraints. A recent work by Guruswami, Lin, Ren, Sun, and Wu (STOC'24) established PIH under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). In this work, we improve the quantitative aspects of PIH and prove (under ETH) that approximating sparse parameterized CSPs within a constant factor requires $n^{k^{1-o(1)}}$ time. This immediately implies that, assuming ETH, finding a $(k/2)$-clique in an $n$-vertex graph with a $k$-clique requires $n^{k^{1-o(1)}}$ time. We also prove almost optimal time lower bounds for approximating $k$-ExactCover and Max $k$-Coverage. Our proof follows the blueprint of the previous work to identify a "vector-structured" ETH-hard CSP whose satisfiability can be checked via an appropriate form of "parallel" PCP. Using further ideas in the reduction, we guarantee additional structures for constraints in the CSP. We then leverage this to design a parallel PCP of almost linear size based on Reed-Muller codes and derandomized low degree testing.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Improved Lower Bounds for Approximating Parameterized Nearest Codeword and Related Problems under ETH

In this paper we present a new gap-creating randomized self-reduction for parameterized Maximum Likelihood Decoding problem over $\mathbb{F}_p$ ($k$-MLD$_p$). The reduction takes a $k$-MLD$_p$ instance with $k\cdot n$ vectors as input, runs in time $f(k)n^{O(1)}$ for some computable function $f$, outputs a $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-Gap-$k'$-MLD$_p$ instance for any $\varepsilon>0$, where $k'=O(k^2\log k)$. Using this reduction, we show that assuming the randomized Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), no algorithms can approximate $k$-MLD$_p$ (and therefore its dual problem $k$-NCP$_p$) within factor $(3/2-\varepsilon)$ in $f(k)\cdot n^{o(\sqrt{k/\log k})}$ time for any $\varepsilon>0$. We then use reduction by Bhattacharyya, Ghoshal, Karthik and Manurangsi (ICALP 2018) to amplify the $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-gap to any constant. As a result, we show that assuming ETH, no algorithms can approximate $k$-NCP$_p$ and $k$-MDP$_p$ within $\gamma$-factor in $f(k)n^{o(k^{\varepsilon_\gamma})}$ time for some constant $\varepsilon_\gamma>0$. Combining with the gap-preserving reduction by Bennett, Cheraghchi, Guruswami and Ribeiro (STOC 2023), we also obtain similar lower bounds for $k$-MDP$_p$, $k$-CVP$_p$ and $k$-SVP$_p$. These results improve upon the previous $f(k)n^{\Omega(\mathsf{poly} \log k)}$ lower bounds for these problems under ETH using reductions by Bhattacharyya et al. (J.ACM 2021) and Bennett et al. (STOC 2023).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

FPT Approximation using Treewidth: Capacitated Vertex Cover, Target Set Selection and Vector Dominating Set

Treewidth is a useful tool in designing graph algorithms. Although many NP-hard graph problems can be solved in linear time when the input graphs have small treewidth, there are problems which remain hard on graphs of bounded treewidth. In this paper, we consider three vertex selection problems that are W[1]-hard when parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph, namely the capacitated vertex cover problem, the target set selection problem and the vector dominating set problem. We provide two new methods to obtain FPT approximation algorithms for these problems. For the capacitated vertex cover problem and the vector dominating set problem, we obtain $(1+o(1))$-approximation FPT algorithms. For the target set selection problem, we give an FPT algorithm providing a tradeoff between its running time and the approximation ratio.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis under ETH

The Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) asserts that no fixed parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm can distinguish a satisfiable CSP instance, parameterized by the number of variables, from one where every assignment fails to satisfy an $\varepsilon$ fraction of constraints for some absolute constant $\varepsilon > 0$. PIH plays the role of the PCP theorem in parameterized complexity. However, PIH has only been established under Gap-ETH, a very strong assumption with an inherent gap. In this work, we prove PIH under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). This is the first proof of PIH from a gap-free assumption. Our proof is self-contained and elementary. We identify an ETH-hard CSP whose variables take vector values, and constraints are either linear or of a special parallel structure. Both kinds of constraints can be checked with constant soundness via a "parallel PCP of proximity" based on the Walsh-Hadamard code.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Improved Hardness of Approximating k-Clique under ETH

In this paper, we prove that assuming the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), there is no $f(k)\cdot n^{k^{o(1/\log\log k)}}$-time algorithm that can decide whether an $n$-vertex graph contains a clique of size $k$ or contains no clique of size $k/2$, and no FPT algorithm can decide whether an input graph has a clique of size $k$ or no clique of size $k/f(k)$, where $f(k)$ is some function in $k^{1-o(1)}$. Our results significantly improve the previous works [Lin21, LRSW22]. The crux of our proof is a framework to construct gap-producing reductions for the $k$-Clique problem. More precisely, we show that given an error-correcting code $C:\Sigma_1^k\to\Sigma_2^{k'}$ that is locally testable and smooth locally decodable in the parallel setting, one can construct a reduction which on input a graph $G$ outputs a graph $G'$ in $(k')^{O(1)}\cdot n^{O(\log|\Sigma_2|/\log|\Sigma_1|)}$ time such that: $\bullet$ If $G$ has a clique of size $k$, then $G'$ has a clique of size $K$, where $K = (k')^{O(1)}$. $\bullet$ If $G$ has no clique of size $k$, then $G'$ has no clique of size $(1-\varepsilon)\cdot K$ for some constant $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$. We then construct such a code with $k'=k^{\Theta(\log\log k)}$ and $|\Sigma_2|=|\Sigma_1|^{k^{0.54}}$, establishing the hardness results above. Our code generalizes the derivative code [WY07] into the case with a super constant order of derivatives.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Constant Approximating Parameterized $k$-SetCover is W[2]-hard

In this paper, we prove that it is W[2]-hard to approximate k-SetCover within any constant ratio. Our proof is built upon the recently developed threshold graph composition technique. We propose a strong notion of threshold graphs and use a new composition method to prove this result. Our technique could also be applied to rule out polynomial time $o\left(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)$ ratio approximation algorithms for the non-parameterized k-SetCover problem with $k$ as small as $O\left(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)^3$, assuming W[1]$\neq$FPT. We highlight that our proof does not depend on the well-known PCP theorem, and only involves simple combinatorial objects.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

On Lower Bounds of Approximating Parameterized $k$-Clique

Given a simple graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the goal of $k$-Clique problem is to decide if $G$ contains a complete subgraph of size $k$. We say an algorithm approximates $k$-Clique within a factor $g(k)$ if it can find a clique of size at least $k / g(k)$ when $G$ is guaranteed to have a $k$-clique. Recently, it was shown that approximating $k$-Clique within a constant factor is W[1]-hard [Lin21]. We study the approximation of $k$-Clique under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). The reduction of [Lin21] already implies an $n^{\Omega(\sqrt[6]{\log k})}$-time lower bound under ETH. We improve this lower bound to $n^{\Omega(\log k)}$. Using the gap-amplification technique by expander graphs, we also prove that there is no $k^{o(1)}$ factor FPT-approximation algorithm for $k$-Clique under ETH. We also suggest a new way to prove the Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) under ETH. We show that if there is no $n^{O(\frac{k}{\log k})}$ algorithm to approximate $k$-Clique within a constant factor, then PIH is true.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

Constant Approximating k-Clique is W[1]-hard

For every graph $G$, let $\omega(G)$ be the largest size of complete subgraph in $G$. This paper presents a simple algorithm which, on input a graph $G$, a positive integer $k$ and a small constant $\epsilon>0$, outputs a graph $G'$ and an integer $k'$ in $2^{\Theta(k^5)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$-time such that (1) $k'\le 2^{\Theta(k^5)}$, (2) if $\omega(G)\ge k$, then $\omega(G')\ge k'$, (3) if $\omega(G)<k$, then $\omega(G')< (1-\epsilon)k'$. This implies that no $f(k)\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$-time algorithm can distinguish between the cases $\omega(G)\ge k$ and $\omega(G)<k/c$ for any constant $c\ge 1$ and computable function $f$, unless $FPT= W[1]$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2019

Parameterized Intractability of Even Set and Shortest Vector Problem

The $k$-Even Set problem is a parameterized variant of the Minimum Distance Problem of linear codes over $\mathbb F_2$, which can be stated as follows: given a generator matrix $\mathbf A$ and an integer $k$, determine whether the code generated by $\mathbf A$ has distance at most $k$, or in other words, whether there is a nonzero vector $\mathbf{x}$ such that $\mathbf A \mathbf{x}$ has at most $k$ nonzero coordinates. The question of whether $k$-Even Set is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by the distance $k$ has been repeatedly raised in literature; in fact, it is one of the few remaining open questions from the seminal book of Downey and Fellows (1999). In this work, we show that $k$-Even Set is W[1]-hard under randomized reductions. We also consider the parameterized $k$-Shortest Vector Problem (SVP), in which we are given a lattice whose basis vectors are integral and an integer $k$, and the goal is to determine whether the norm of the shortest vector (in the $\ell_p$ norm for some fixed $p$) is at most $k$. Similar to $k$-Even Set, understanding the complexity of this problem is also a long-standing open question in the field of Parameterized Complexity. We show that, for any $p > 1$, $k$-SVP is W[1]-hard to approximate (under randomized reductions) to some constant factor.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2019

A Simple Gap-producing Reduction for the Parameterized Set Cover Problem

Given an $n$-vertex bipartite graph $I=(S,U,E)$, the goal of set cover problem is to find a minimum sized subset of $S$ such that every vertex in $U$ is adjacent to some vertex of this subset. It is NP-hard to approximate set cover to within a $(1-o(1))\ln n$ factor. If we use the size of the optimum solution $k$ as the parameter, then it can be solved in $n^{k+o(1)}$ time. A natural question is: can we approximate set cover to within an $o(\ln n)$ factor in $n^{k-\epsilon}$ time? In a recent breakthrough result, Karthik, Laekhanukit and Manurangsi showed that assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), for any computable function $f$, no $f(k)\cdot n^{k-\epsilon}$-time algorithm can approximate set cover to a factor below $(\log n)^{\frac{1}{poly(k,e(\epsilon))}}$ for some function $e$. This paper presents a simple gap-producing reduction which, given a set cover instance $I=(S,U,E)$ and two integers $k<h\le (1-o(1))\sqrt[k]{\log |S|/\log\log |S|}$, outputs a new set cover instance $I'=(S,U',E')$ with $|U'|=|U|^{h^k}|S|^{O(1)}$ in $|U|^{h^k}\cdot |S|^{O(1)}$ time such that: (1) if $I$ has a $k$-sized solution, then so does $I'$; (2) if $I$ has no $k$-sized solution, then every solution of $I'$ must contain at least $h$ vertices. Setting $h=(1-o(1))\sqrt[k]{\log |S|/\log\log |S|}$, we show that assuming SETH, for any computable function $f$, no $f(k)\cdot n^{k-\epsilon}$-time algorithm can distinguish between a set cover instance with $k$-sized solution and one whose minimum solution size is at least $(1-o(1))\cdot \sqrt[k]{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}$. This improves the result of Karthik, Laekhanukit and Manurangsi.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

The Hardness of Embedding Grids and Walls

The dichotomy conjecture for the parameterized embedding problem states that the problem of deciding whether a given graph $G$ from some class $K$ of "pattern graphs" can be embedded into a given graph $H$ (that is, is isomorphic to a subgraph of $H$) is fixed-parameter tractable if $K$ is a class of graphs of bounded tree width and $W[1]$-complete otherwise. Towards this conjecture, we prove that the embedding problem is $W[1]$-complete if $K$ is the class of all grids or the class of all walls.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2016

Fixed-parameter Approximability of Boolean MinCSPs

The minimum unsatisfiability version of a constraint satisfaction problem (MinCSP) asks for an assignment where the number of unsatisfied constraints is minimum possible, or equivalently, asks for a minimum-size set of constraints whose deletion makes the instance satisfiable. For a finite set $\Gamma$ of constraints, we denote by MinCSP($\Gamma$) the restriction of the problem where each constraint is from $\Gamma$. The polynomial-time solvability and the polynomial-time approximability of MinCSP($\Gamma$) were fully characterized by Khanna et al. [Siam J. Comput. '00]. Here we study the fixed-parameter (FP-) approximability of the problem: given an instance and an integer $k$, one has to find a solution of size at most $g(k)$ in time $f(k)n^{O(1)}$ if a solution of size at most $k$ exists. We especially focus on the case of constant-factor FP-approximability. We show the following dichotomy: for each finite constraint language $\Gamma$, either we exhibit a constant-factor FP-approximation for MinCSP($\Gamma$); or we prove that MinCSP($\Gamma$) has no constant-factor FP-approximation unless FPT$=$W[1]. In particular, we show that approximating the so-called Nearest Codeword within some constant factor is W[1]-hard. Recently, Arnab et al. [ICALP '18] showed that such a W[1]-hardness of approximation implies that Even Set is W[1]-hard under randomized reductions. Combining our results, we therefore settle the parameterized complexity of Even Set, a famous open question in the field.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

The Constant Inapproximability of the Parameterized Dominating Set Problem

We prove that there is no fpt-algorithm that can approximate the dominating set problem with any constant ratio, unless FPT= W[1]. Our hardness reduction is built on the second author's recent W[1]-hardness proof of the biclique problem. This yields, among other things, a proof without the PCP machinery that the classical dominating set problem has no polynomial time constant approximation under the exponential time hypothesis.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2014

The Parameterized Complexity of k-Biclique

Given a graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, the $k$-biclique problem asks whether $G$ contains a complete bipartite subgraph $K_{k,k}$. This is the most easily stated problem on graphs whose parameterized complexity is still unknown. We provide an fpt-reduction from $k$-clique to $k$-biclique, thus solving this longstanding open problem. Our reduction use a class of bipartite graphs with a threshold property of independent interest. More specifically, for positive integers $n$, $s$ and $t$, we consider a bipartite graph $G=(A\;\dot\cup\;B, E)$ such that $A$ can be partitioned into $A=V_1\;\dot\cup \;V_2\;\dot\cup\cdots\dot\cup\; V_n$ and for every $s$ distinct indices $i_1\cdots i_s$, there exist $v_{i_1}\in V_{i_1}\cdots v_{i_s}\in V_{i_s}$ such that $v_{i_1}\cdots v_{i_s}$ have at least $t+1$ common neighbors in $B$; on the other hand, every $s+1$ distinct vertices in $A$ have at most $t$ common neighbors in $B$. Using the Paley-type graphs and Weil's character sum theorem, we show that for $t=(s+1)!$ and $n$ large enough, such threshold bipartite graphs can be computed in $n^{O(1)}$. One corollary of our reduction is that there is no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ time algorithm to decide whether a graph contains a subgraph isomorphic to $K_{k!,k!}$ unless the ETH(Exponential Time Hypothesis) fails. We also provide a probabilistic construction with better parameters $t=\Theta(s^2)$, which indicates that $k$-biclique has no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(\sqrt{k})}$-time algorithm unless 3-SAT with $m$ clauses can be solved in $2^{o(m)}$-time with high probability. Our result also implies the dichotomy classification of the parameterized complexity of cardinality constrain satisfaction problem and the inapproximability of maximum $k$-intersection problem.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2012

The parameterized complexity of k-edge induced subgraphs

We prove that finding a $k$-edge induced subgraph is fixed-parameter tractable, thereby answering an open problem of Leizhen Cai. Our algorithm is based on several combinatorial observations, Gauss' famous \emph{Eureka} theorem [Andrews, 86], and a generalization of the well-known fpt-algorithm for the model-checking problem for first-order logic on graphs with locally bounded tree-width due to Frick and Grohe [Frick and Grohe, 01]. On the other hand, we show that two natural counting versions of the problem are hard. Hence, the $k$-edge induced subgraph problem is one of the rare known examples in parameterized complexity that are easy for decision while hard for counting.

cs.DS↗