Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Brwa Shukur Ismael

Publications and source records attributed to Brwa Shukur Ismael.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Ranking Prompt--Plateau Correlations in Gamma-Ray Bursts with Symbolic Regression

Gamma-ray burst (GRB) correlations probe central engines, relativistic outflows, and radiation processes. The Dainotti relation is an anticorrelation between the X-ray plateau luminosity $L_a$ and rest-frame plateau duration $T_a^{\rm rest}$. We use symbolic regression to compare it with other low-dimensional correlations in 251 GRBs with Swift-XRT plateau properties and Swift-BAT prompt-emission parameters. We perform a Dainotti-guided search, in which $\log T_a^{\rm rest}$ is always present, and an unrestricted search over subsets of at most three variables. The guided search recovers the Dainotti dependence; a D'Agostini fit gives $\log L_a=(51.92\pm0.30)-(1.31\pm0.09)\log T_a^{\rm rest}$, with intrinsic scatter $σ_{\rm int}=0.82\pm0.05$ dex. In the unrestricted ranking of 377 feature subsets, the classical Dainotti relation remains competitive, within the top $\sim25\%$ of the tested search spaces. The highest-ranked screened expression is $\log L_a\approx0.855\log L_{\rm peak}-0.782\log T_a^{\rm rest}$, with RMSE $\approx0.46$ and $R^2\approx0.88$. The highest-ranked runs repeatedly reduce to this prompt--plateau structure, without retaining additional spectral, absorption, or afterglow-shape variables. A direct regression gives $\log L_a=4.718+0.776\log L_{\rm peak}-0.805\log T_a^{\rm rest}$, with $R_{\rm P}=0.91$ for 246 bursts. An errors-in-variables refit gives consistent coefficients. After removing shared luminosity-distance dependence, the relation retains non-negligible explanatory power ($R^2\approx0.62$), consistent with a possible intrinsic component. Restricted Monte Carlo null tests give $p\approx0.01$. Plateau luminosity therefore shows a coupled dependence on prompt luminosity and plateau duration.

astro-ph.HE↗

Prompt and Afterglow Constraints on the Central Engine of GRB 240825A

GRB 240825A shows unprecedented temporal and spectral features that constrain the properties of its inner engine: (1) a prompt emission three-component spectrum consisting of a Band function continuum, a quasi-thermal bump, and a hard MeV tail; and (2) an X-ray afterglow fitted by a power-law decay with index $1.29 \pm 0.02$; and (3) a $6.37 \pm 0.05$ Hz quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) identified in the 100-300 keV band during the 2.07-3.25 s time interval, coinciding with the photospheric radiation phase. We compare two central-engine candidates: (a) a newborn millisecond magnetar undergoing multipolar spin-down, free precession, and global magnetoelastic oscillations of its interior; and (b) a Kerr black hole powering a Blandford-Znajek jet subject to Lense-Thirring disk precession. In principle, both channels can reproduce the observed QPO frequency but impose different constraints on the energetics, temporal evolution, and the origin of the oscillation. We first demonstrate that the X-ray afterglow is quantitatively reproduced by a hexapolar magnetar spin-down model with an initial spin period of $P_0 \simeq 1.38$ ms and a surface field of $B_{\rm hexa} \simeq 2.04 \times 10^{16}$ G. The decay index measures a braking index rather than the field multipolarity, does not exclude a fallback-regulated flow, and leaves $P_0$ and $B_{\rm hexa}$ uncertain by a factor of a few. In this scenario, magnetic or magnetoinertial dynamics of the star interior provide a plausible explanation of the QPO without invoking extreme stellar deformations. Although a black hole engine cannot be firmly excluded, the combined prompt and afterglow observational properties of GRB 240825A favor a long-lived magnetar central engine.

astro-ph.HE↗