Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Caecilia Charbonnier

Publications and source records attributed to Caecilia Charbonnier.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Bringing physics-based controller policies to virtual reality

Nowadays, it is easy to set up any element of a VR experience so users can interact with it physically, except for interactive VR characters. Can we extend this to animated VR characters? In this work, we studied whether physics-based character animation (PBCA) controllers can produce high-quality movement in VR-compatible environments (Unity3D, WebXR). We evaluated the quality of the results, as well as the losses at each stage of the processing pipeline: data ingest, training and inference. For data ingest, we computed accuracy metrics related to the retargeting method used. For training, we computed accuracy metrics related to different training policies and different training environments. We developed new JAX implementations of state-of-the-art PBCA controllers (DeepMimic, AMP and ADD) which can be trained in MuJoCo-MJX in minutes, 50 times faster than in a traditional CPU-based training environment. The benefit of these particular implementations is that the resulting control policies can be readily transferred to Unity3D and support cross-platform compilation, including Android, something critical for use in VR production. For inference, we tested these controller policies in Unity3D and WebXR. Our results suggest that DeepMimic and ADD trained in MuJoCo-MJX generate controller policies with better animation fidelity than other methods. To simplify the comparison between controller policies, and different reference animations, we implemented an animation fidelity index (afi). Its results are analogous to other more common metrics, but afi is more intuitive to interpret and thus simplifies the comparison of training methods across the successive stages of the processing pipeline.

cs.HC↗

HUMAN4D: A Human-Centric Multimodal Dataset for Motions and Immersive Media

We introduce HUMAN4D, a large and multimodal 4D dataset that contains a variety of human activities simultaneously captured by a professional marker-based MoCap, a volumetric capture and an audio recording system. By capturing 2 female and $2$ male professional actors performing various full-body movements and expressions, HUMAN4D provides a diverse set of motions and poses encountered as part of single- and multi-person daily, physical and social activities (jumping, dancing, etc.), along with multi-RGBD (mRGBD), volumetric and audio data. Despite the existence of multi-view color datasets captured with the use of hardware (HW) synchronization, to the best of our knowledge, HUMAN4D is the first and only public resource that provides volumetric depth maps with high synchronization precision due to the use of intra- and inter-sensor HW-SYNC. Moreover, a spatio-temporally aligned scanned and rigged 3D character complements HUMAN4D to enable joint research on time-varying and high-quality dynamic meshes. We provide evaluation baselines by benchmarking HUMAN4D with state-of-the-art human pose estimation and 3D compression methods. For the former, we apply 2D and 3D pose estimation algorithms both on single- and multi-view data cues. For the latter, we benchmark open-source 3D codecs on volumetric data respecting online volumetric video encoding and steady bit-rates. Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative visual comparison between mesh-based volumetric data reconstructed in different qualities showcases the available options with respect to 4D representations. HUMAN4D is introduced to the computer vision and graphics research communities to enable joint research on spatio-temporally aligned pose, volumetric, mRGBD and audio data cues. The dataset and its code are available https://tofis.github.io/myurls/human4d.

cs.CV↗

Content Format and Quality of Experience in Virtual Reality

In this paper, we investigate three forms of virtual reality content production and consumption. Namely, 360 stereoscopic video, the combination of a 3D environment with a video billboard for dynamic elements, and a full 3D rendered scene. On one hand, video based techniques facilitate the acquisition of content, but they can limit the experience of the user since the content is captured from a fixed point of view. On the other hand, 3D content allows for point of view translation, but real-time photorealistic rendering is not trivial and comes at high production and processing costs. We also compare the two extremes with an approach that combines dynamic video elements with a 3D virtual environment. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these systems, and present the result of a user study with 24 participants. In the study, we evaluated the quality of experience, including presence, simulation sickness and participants' assessment of content quality, of three versions of a cinematic segment with two actors. We found that, in this context, mixing video and 3D content produced the best experience.

cs.MM↗