Chi Chen | Search arXiv

arXiv2026

Towards Scaling Quantum Fine-Tuning of Foundational Time Series Models for Classification

Time-series foundation models produce rich embeddings, but whether quantum models can exploit them, and how far hybrid classical-quantum architectures scale, remains unclear. We address this by fine-tuning Chronos for power-grid event classification (PSML-5) with a quantum head on the model's embeddings. Grouping embeddings by physical sensor type before summarization already surpasses the best published baseline built for this benchmark, and with finer-grained features the quantum head outperforms a larger classical multilayer perceptron on identical inputs by 1.7-2.0 percentage points of balanced accuracy. Yet the gains saturate: past a point, feeding more information to the same fixed-width register yields no improvement. We show the bottleneck is neither the supply of information nor circuit expressiveness, but the bandwidth of the data intake. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the wing module, a self-contained few-qubit circuit that feeds additional information into the core circuit through a sparse, one-way coupling. Under a preregistered four-seed protocol, we attach wings to a fixed 12-qubit core with fixed features. Balanced accuracy increases with each added wing, from 83.6% with no wings (13 qubits, including a post-selection qubit) to 85.2% with two (19 qubits). Ablations establish that a circuit enlarged without new information gains nothing, while a wing fed information from the wrong sample harms accuracy. These results reframe scaling for quantum fine-tuning: added qubits help when they carry added inputs, not merely more parameters. Wings offer a modular and stable route to widening that bandwidth.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Imagination Helps Visual Reasoning, But Not Yet in Latent Space

Latent visual reasoning aims to mimic human's imagination process by meditating through hidden states of Multimodal Large Language Models. While recognized as a promising paradigm for visual reasoning, the underlying mechanisms driving its effectiveness remain unclear. Motivated to demystify the true source of its efficacy, we investigate the validity of latent reasoning using Causal Mediation Analysis. We model the process as a causal chain: the input as the treatment, the latent tokens as the mediator, and the final answer as the outcome. Our findings uncover two critical disconnections: (a) Input-Latent Disconnect: dramatic perturbations on the input result in negligible changes to the latent tokens, suggesting that latent tokens do not effectively attend to the input sequence. (b) Latent-Answer Disconnect: perturbations on the latent tokens yield minimal impact on the final answer, indicating the limited causal effect latent tokens imposing on the outcome. Furthermore, extensive probing analysis reveals that latent tokens encode limited visual information and exhibit high similarity. Consequently, we challenge the necessity of latent reasoning and propose a straightforward alternative named CapImagine, which teaches the model to explicitly imagine using text. Experiments on vision-centric benchmarks show that CapImagine significantly outperforms complex latent-space baselines, highlighting the superior potential of visual reasoning through explicit imagination.

cs.CL↗