arXiv subjects

Christofer Hardcastle

Publications and source records attributed to Christofer Hardcastle.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Portfolio-Based Constrained Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design

Materials discovery and design campaigns can be formulated as constrained multi-objective Bayesian optimization (CMOBO) problems, within which each experimental decision negotiates between two coupled but competing goals: discovering feasible candidates and refining the underlying Pareto front. Here we recast acquisition-function choice as an adaptive policy-selection problem over a portfolio of conventional and feasibility-focused acquisition functions. This was done using two controllers: UCB-Bandit, a modified UCB multi-armed bandit, and Agentic-Switch, a multi-agent decision system driven by a large language model (LLM). Both were evaluated against fixed-policy baselines in silico across five synthetic benchmark functions and two materials design case studies. The adaptive policies performed competitively in terms of both cumulative feasibility count and feasible hypervolume improvement, while each individual acquisition function performed well for only one metric, suggesting that adaptive policies are better suited for constrained materials science problems.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2025

Good Enough is Better: Feasibility vs. Pareto-Optimality in Alloy Design

In alloy design, the search for candidate materials is often framed as an optimization problem, with the goal of identifying Pareto-optimal solutions across multiple objectives. However, Pareto-optimal solutions do not necessarily satisfy all minimum performance thresholds required for practical deployment. An alternative approach is to treat alloy design as a constraint satisfaction problem, in which the goal is to identify any solution that meets all bare minimum requirements across multiple quantities of interest. These approaches have yet to be benchmarked against each other in the context of realistic alloy design problems. In this work, we demonstrate that, in realistic alloy design campaigns involving multiple objectives and constraints, the constraint satisfaction framework yields a higher likelihood of finding viable alloys than optimization-based approaches. Furthermore, constraint-satisfaction approaches find the first viable alloy solutions earlier than optimization. Our results suggest that focusing on feasibility rather than optimality can lead to more actionable outcomes in materials discovery, particularly in highly constrained applications.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2025

Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Classification for Constraint-Aware Alloy Design

Alloy design can be framed as a constraint-satisfaction problem. Building on previous methodologies, we propose equipping Gaussian Process Classifiers (GPCs) with physics-informed prior mean functions to model the boundaries of feasible design spaces. Through three case studies, we highlight the utility of informative priors for handling constraints on continuous and categorical properties. (1) Phase Stability: By incorporating CALPHAD predictions as priors for solid-solution phase stability, we enhance model validation using a publicly available XRD dataset. (2) Phase Stability Prediction Refinement: We demonstrate an in silico active learning approach to efficiently correct phase diagrams. (3) Continuous Property Thresholds: By embedding priors into continuous property models, we accelerate the discovery of alloys meeting specific property thresholds via active learning. In each case, integrating physics-based insights into the classification framework substantially improved model performance, demonstrating an efficient strategy for constraint-aware alloy design.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗