arXiv subjects

David Elbert

Publications and source records attributed to David Elbert.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Toward Trustworthy Autonomous Science: A Two-Year Community Roadmap

One year ago, the AISLE roadmap argued that autonomous laboratories operated as isolated islands and proposed a grassroots network organized around five critical dimensions. The field has since moved faster than anticipated. Multi-agent systems have produced experimentally validated hypotheses, self-driving laboratories have grown more interoperable and orchestrated, reasoning-trained and domain foundation models have raised the capability ceiling, and the Genesis Mission has placed autonomous experimentation at the center of U.S. federal science strategy, with industry emerging as a primary actor. Progress has met a sobering counter-current, including a corrected flagship discovery result, benchmarks showing that agents which rival experts on closed-ended questions still complete only a fraction of open-ended research, and fabricated citations surfacing at leading venues. We read this as the defining tension of the field. Producing a candidate discovery is no longer the hard part, but verifying it is, and this asymmetry now limits autonomous science more than raw model capability. We update the roadmap around seven dimensions, revisiting the original five and elevating two former cross-cutting concerns, trust, verification, and reproducibility, and safety, security, and governance, to first-class status. We assess the original milestones (M1 through M14) as achieved, partially achieved, reframed, or open, add four new milestones (M15 through M18), and scope the path forward to a two-year horizon. The first year concentrates on interfaces, protocol adoption, and the scaffolding of verification, and the second targets federation, zero-trust coordination, and governance. Throughout, we position the grassroots network as the interoperability fabric that lets national programs, international initiatives, and commercial platforms connect rather than re-silo.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

A BRAVE Alloy Design Campaign (Bayesian Risk-aware Alloy discoVery and Exploration)

In constrained alloy optimization, the compositions with the highest performance potential often reside at the boundary of phase stability -- where the risk of experimental failure is also highest. This work demonstrates this principle through a risk-aware Bayesian optimization campaign on single-phase FCC high-entropy alloys in the Al-V-Cr-Mn-Fe-Co-Ni-Cu system. A learned feasibility classifier, integrated directly into the multi-objective acquisition function, probabilistically penalizes candidates likely to produce failed experiments while preserving access to high-performing boundary compositions. From approximately 27,000 CALPHAD-screened candidates, 48 alloys were synthesized over three closed-loop iterations targeting five objectives (yield strength, UTS/YS ratio, strain at UTS, dynamic-to-quasi-static hardness ratio, and simulated depth of penetration), exploring 0.12\% of the feasible space. Two compositional regimes emerged: a V-rich, Ni-rich high-strength regime (UTS up to ${\sim}1480$~MPa at 50% elongation) and a Mn-containing high-ductility regime (UTS/YS up to 4.20 at $>$50% elongation). Among feasible alloys, vanadium simultaneously drives yield strength ($r = 0.84$) and sigma-phase formation ($r = 0.54$ with infeasibility); at V = 24~at.%, the three strongest alloys and three sigma failures share the same compositional point. Additionally, the strongest performing alloys cluster in a narrow region of compositional space (V $\geq$ 20 at.%, Ni $\geq$ 36 at.%), representing ${\sim}100$ of $27,074$ feasible candidates -- a probability of $P \approx 6.5 \times 10^{-6}$ under random sampling. This dual role -- consistent with the KKT prediction that constrained optima lie on active constraint boundaries -- required feasibility-aware acquisition to access; hard filtering would have excluded this region entirely.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2026

AIMD-L: An automated laboratory for high-throughput characterization of structural materials for extreme environments

Rapid developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning as applied to materials science are creating an urgent need for experimental data, which can be provided by high-throughput and autonomous laboratories. To date most demonstrations of such laboratories have focused on functional materials, with less attention paid to structural materials. We present here the Artificial Intelligence in Materials Design Laboratory (AIMD-L), an automated, high-throughput facility for characterizing the microstructure and properties of structural metals and ceramics, with an emphasis on materials in extreme environments. AIMD-L has two custom instruments for characterization of structural materials: HELIX for shock studies of materials, and MAXIMA for X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Specifically designed for high-throughput studies, HELIX and MAXIMA are each capable of collecting data at rates two to three orders of magnitude faster than conventional systems. A third experimental station, SPHINX, is a commercial nanoindenter modified for integration into the automated workflow of AIMD-L. A user (which may be human or an AI agent) directs the experiments to be carried out by means of a centralized control program. The experimental stations are linked by a conveyance that moves samples around the lab, with a robot at each station for sample transfer in/out of the instrument. The experimental stations also communicate with a common data layer that streams data autonomously from each instrument to a data portal, where their arrival triggers automated workflows for data reduction and analysis. The processed data are immediately available to the human operator or agentic AI, forming a closed loop for rapid decision-making and experimental control.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2025

Automated laboratory x-ray diffractometer and fluorescence spectrometer for high-throughput materials characterization

The increasing importance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in materials research has created demand for automated, high-throughput characterization techniques capable of rapidly generating large data sets. We describe here a new instrument for simultaneous X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, optimized for high-throughput studies of combinatorial specimens. A bright, focused, high-energy X-ray beam (24 keV) combined with a pixel array area detector allows spatially-resolved (~200 {\mu}m) transmission diffraction measurements through thick (100 {\mu}m) specimens of structural metals with exposure times as short as 1 s. Simultaneously, a silicon drift detector records X-ray fluorescence from the specimen for spatially-resolved measurement of composition. Specimen handling is fully automated, with a robot inside the X-ray enclosure manipulating the sample for measurements at different locations. Data orchestration is also automated, with data streamed off the instrument and processed autonomously. In this paper we assess the performance of the instrument in terms of throughput, resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio, and provide an example of its capabilities through a combinatorial study of Cu-Ti alloys to demonstrate rapid data set creation.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2024

Datatractor: Metadata, automation, and registries for extractor interoperability in the chemical and materials sciences

Two key issues hindering the transition towards FAIR data science are the poor discoverability and inconsistent instructions for the use of data extractor tools, i.e., how we go from raw data files created by instruments, to accessible metadata and scientific insight. If the existing format conversion tools are hard to find, install, and use, their reimplementation will lead to a duplication of effort, and an increase in the associated maintenance burden is inevitable. The Datatractor framework presented in this work addresses these issues. First, by providing a curated registry of such extractor tools their discoverability will increase. Second, by describing them using a standardised but lightweight schema, their installation and use is machine-actionable. Finally, we provide a reference implementation for such data extraction. The Datatractor framework can be used to provide a public-facing data extraction service, or be incorporated into other research data management tools providing added value.

physics.data-an↗