Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Donghoon Han

Publications and source records attributed to Donghoon Han.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

WSPolypNet: Weakly Supervised Polyp Localization in Colonoscopy Videos

Because dense frame-level annotation of colonoscopy videos is costly, we propose WSPolypNet, a weakly supervised framework for polyp localization using only video-level labels. WSPolypNet employs a 3D convolutional neural network trained with video-level supervision to generate class activation maps (CAMs), which identify candidate polyp regions without requiring frame-level spatial annotations. The CAM-derived localization cues are further enhanced using a multi-view strategy and provided to MedSAM2 as point prompts. MedSAM2 then propagates segmentation masks across the video, refining the coarse localization cues according to polyp boundaries. WSPolypNet achieved CorLoc scores of 47.80%, 43.68%, and 35.01% at IoU thresholds of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7, respectively, compared with 36.87%, 33.72%, and 27.94% in the single-view setting. For small polyps, the multi-view strategy improved CorLoc@0.5 from 16.01% to 30.97%. The framework also achieved a recall of 94.51%. These results demonstrate the potential of weakly supervised spatiotemporal learning to substantially reduce spatial annotation requirements for polyp localization in colonoscopy videos.

cs.CV

Where Do Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders Fail on Low-Resource Languages?

Recent multilingual vision--language encoders cover hundreds of languages in a single model, yet on two state-of-the-art instances retrieval on low-resource languages (LRL; e.g. Swahili) trails high-resource ones (HRL; e.g. English) by $30^+$\,pp. We ask where in the trained encoder this gap is located. Prior modality-gap and cross-lingual subspace work suggests a linear language direction at the output crowds out alignment-relevant geometry. We falsify this: LEACE drives the linear language classifier from $>99\%$ to near chance and iterated INLP to $37$--$50\%$ while LRL retrieval moves within $\pm 1.5$\,pp and all tier means within $2.2$\,pp, tracking random controls. The linear bias is a \emph{symptom}, not the cause. Instead, the alignment-causal factor lies along the encoder's forward path: the EOS (end-of-sequence) hidden state's per-language trajectory diverges with depth. Substituting the EOS with its parallel English value three blocks before the projector lifts Swahili from $22.1\%$ to $69.1\%$ on one encoder (and reproduces on the other); three controls rule out pooled-position tautology and English specificity. A front-layer trunk that pulls each language's projection toward the parallel-content centroid corroborates the diagnosis at training time, recovering $+9.6$ / $+17.1$\,pp on LRL XM3600 retrieval (1{,}000-image subset), with consistent gains across three further benchmarks while preserving HRL performance.

cs.CL