Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Fabio Mattiussi

Publications and source records attributed to Fabio Mattiussi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

QICOM: Open-Source Software for Reproducible Image Quality Evaluation, Blinded Assessment, and Radiomic Comparison

QICOM (Quality Image COMparator) is open-source software for quantitative image comparison, paired radiomics, and blinded assessment. It saves processing settings, image identities, measurements, and response mappings so a comparison can be reopened and recalculated. We evaluate reference agreement, responses to controlled perturbations, and recovery of saved analyses. Synthetic experiments cover 37 quantitative descriptors using independentnumerical references and separate upstream integration comparisons. The QICOM/MIRP backend meets the reference tolerances for all 482 numeric IBSI 1 digital-phantom entries and all 1,622 entries across configurations A-E of the public CT reference case; these comprise 1,804 feature/aggregation comparisons and 300 preprocessing diagnostics. Restricting masked SSIM and HFEN to complete kernel support removes the observed dependence on excluded pixels. In a synthetic filtering example, stronger smoothing increases SSIM while worsening MSE and HFEN relative to milder smoothing and changing GLCM contrast more strongly. Reopened radiomics projects reproduce all 43 feature pairs per comparison, and two blinded deliveries return four correctly mapped scripted responses. These experiments document the calculations and data transfers linking the three workflows.

eess.IV↗

RIQE: a NIQE-style reference model for Computed Tomography

The Natural Image Quality Evaluator (NIQE) scores an image by its statistical distance from a model fitted on pristine images, and its distributed model is fitted on photographs. We release the Radiology Image Quality Evaluator (RIQE), a NIQE-style model fitted on 3,792 full-dose slices from 158 patients of the public LDCT-and-Projection-data collection, with a declared intensity mapping, a manifest of every slice and a script that reproduces the fit. On 40 held-out patients, RIQE ranks reduced-dose reconstructions, simulated by projection-domain noise insertion, worse than the full-dose reconstruction of the same slice in 240 of 240 chest and 230 of 240 abdominal pairs, and ranks images with 20% more noise worse than their source in 97.5-100% of cases. Its preferences among filtered images, however, do not follow lesion signal. With a 4 mm, +10 HU lesion inserted in noisy abdominal slices, RIQE prefers bilateral filtering to the unfiltered image in every image up to a 32 HU residual, at which 29% of the lesion's matched-filter signal remains and its detectability index falls from 0.51 to 0.33; it never prefers Gaussian smoothing, which at the same 32 HU residual leaves 70% of the signal and a detectability index of 0.48. Fitted on photographs with the parameters published for NIQE, the same code ranks every simulated reduced-dose abdominal image better than its full-dose counterpart. RIQE is suited to ranking a degraded image against its source; under the conditions tested it should not be the sole criterion for selecting, comparing or tuning denoisers.

eess.IV↗