Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

George Ortiz

Publications and source records attributed to George Ortiz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

When to Waddle: A Comparative Study of Bipedal Torso-Stabilization on Low-Friction Surfaces

Low-friction surfaces challenge bipedal locomotion by limiting the contact forces available during stepping. Inspired by penguin waddling, we investigate how lateral torso motion and center of mass (COM) placement affect locomotion as surface friction changes. Using a five-actuator biped, we compare an upright-gait strategy with a penguin-inspired torso-over-stance-leg strategy across multiple COM placements in simulation and hardware. In the 3-D simulator MuJoCo, we sweep through sinusoidal leg and hip actuation parameters across four friction coefficients mu = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7. In simulation, torso-over-stance-leg motion produces more successful controllers and higher forward speeds at low friction, with the highest speed occurring for the high-COM configuration. Hardware experiments show the same low-friction speed trend: at mu=0.12, torso-over-stance-leg motion increases forward speed and reduces cost of transport at both tested COM ratios, and the higher COM also improves both measures. The high-COM penguin configuration is the fastest and most energy efficient while maintaining low sideways foot motion. At mu=0.45, the COM trend reverses: the lower-COM configurations are faster and more energy efficient, while gait strategy has little effect on forward speed but still changes sideways foot motion. These results show that the effects of lateral torso motion and COM placement depend on the available friction, and that forward speed, energy use, and slip-related foot motion can be modulated with a penguin-inspired torso motion on hardware.

cs.RO↗

Duty Factor Predicts Robust Constrained Quadrupedal Locomotion Across Gait Types

Quadrupedal robots are increasingly deployed in environments where locomotion must remain robust to disturbances and constrained terrain. Gait type, such as walking or trotting, is commonly used to characterize quadrupedal locomotion. However, gait type does not uniquely define locomotion, as parameters such as duty factor, speed, and stance width can vary within a single gait type. In this work, we investigate the relationship between these gait parameters using three distinct quadrupedal locomotion control approaches. First, using whole body trajectory optimization with LQR feedback, we show that duty factor is a stronger predictor of local error convergence than nominal gait type. Second, we investigate duty factor selection with a learned locomotion controller, suggesting how duty factor may serve as a low-dimensional parameter for adapting locomotion robustness in narrow-terrain environments. Finally, we show that these trends persist under a centroidal model predictive control framework and validate them through narrow-terrain experiments on a physical quadruped. These results show that duty factor provides a simple and effective basis for understanding and selecting robust quadrupedal locomotion across gait types and control architectures.

cs.RO↗

Towards Trustworthy Physical AI: From Theory to Practice Across Life Cycle

Physical AI refers to AI systems that understand, reason about, and act in accordance with the physical world and its underlying laws, dynamics, and constraints. Unlike conventional AI systems, physical AI interacts continuously with uncertain physical environments, and its actions produce consequences that are physically irreversible. As existing trustworthy AI frameworks have been developed primarily for digital AI systems, they do not fully capture the distinctive challenges of physical AI, such as physical safety, cyber-physical security, and physical manufacturing process. To address this gap, we present a survey of trustworthy physical AI principles. First, we characterize the core capabilities and challenges of physical AI. Second, we examine the role of physics in AI. Third, we trace the end-to-end physical AI life cycle across five core stages and introduce Trustworthy Physical AI Operationalization (T-PAIO). Fourth, we develop the Trustworthy Physical AI (T-PAI) framework, a theoretical framework that organizes key trustworthiness principles and provides a foundation for governing trustworthy physical AI systems.

cs.AI↗