arXiv subjects

Ghada A. Altarawneh

Publications and source records attributed to Ghada A. Altarawneh.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

EasyClassifier: Honest, Reproducible Machine-Learning Classification for Researchers Who Do Not Program

Machine-learning classification is now used across medicine, the social sciences, economics, education and engineering, very often by researchers who do not program. Two errors recur in such work: preprocessing learned on all rows before cross-validation (data leakage), and reporting the cross-validation score of the classifier that won a comparison (selection bias). Both make published scores optimistic. We present EasyClassifier, an open-source Python package that guides a user from a CSV or Excel file to a finished analysis through a sequence of plain-language, multiple-choice questions, with no code. It makes the correct procedure the default rather than an option: every preprocessing step is learned inside each training fold; the selected classifier receives a separate final score from nested cross-validation (up to 2,000 rows), or an untouched 20% test set; classifiers run with fixed default parameters and fixed random seeds; and every run writes a report with a ready-to-adapt Methods paragraph, the references to cite, and figures prepared for publication. On ten public datasets from seven fields and a random-label control, split in half so that one half served as an untouched external test, the common practice overstated balanced accuracy by 2.9 percentage points on average (up to 9.9 on small data), whereas the score EasyClassifier reports had a mean signed bias of +0.7 points and a mean absolute error of 2.3 points (one-sided Wilcoxon p = 3.2 x 10^{-4}, 30 runs). On random labels it reported 48.8% balanced accuracy against a chance level of 50%. EasyClassifier is available under the MIT license from PyPI (pip install easyclassifier), GitHub, and Zenodo.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Synthetic minority data is redundant or invalid: a data-dependent validity theory and a de-biased test

For two decades, the standard remedy for class-imbalanced learning has been to fabricate synthetic minority examples, and the standard evidence of their validity has been a check that cannot fail: synthetic points are scored against the very data that generated them. We de-bias the check. Validity becomes a population quantity -- the probability that a synthetic point truly belongs to the minority class -- with a consistent estimator that scores synthetic points against withheld real data. Where held-out ground truth is available, the classical test underestimates true invalidity in 96-99% of method-by-imbalance-ratio cells, while the de-biased estimator tracks it closely. We prove validity is a property of the data, not the method: class overlap sets an invalidity floor no faithful generator escapes, making oversampling redundant where classes separate and invalid where they overlap. Across 91 methods, three classifiers, and datasets spanning medicine and finance -- including a generator engineered to pass the classical check -- none clears both bars: gains over the best trivial baseline are noise-thin (median below 0.01 F1, a decision threshold's reach), and most damage calibration. We release the audit as a pip-installable test and flip the burden of proof: synthetic minority data must now demonstrate, on the data at hand, both validity and information gain.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Stop Oversampling for Class Imbalance Learning: A Critical Review

For the last two decades, oversampling has been employed to overcome the challenge of learning from imbalanced datasets. Many approaches to solving this challenge have been offered in the literature. Oversampling, on the other hand, is a concern. That is, models trained on fictitious data may fail spectacularly when put to real-world problems. The fundamental difficulty with oversampling approaches is that, given a real-life population, the synthesized samples may not truly belong to the minority class. As a result, training a classifier on these samples while pretending they represent minority may result in incorrect predictions when the model is used in the real world. We analyzed a large number of oversampling methods in this paper and devised a new oversampling evaluation system based on hiding a number of majority examples and comparing them to those generated by the oversampling process. Based on our evaluation system, we ranked all these methods based on their incorrectly generated examples for comparison. Our experiments using more than 70 oversampling methods and three imbalanced real-world datasets reveal that all oversampling methods studied generate minority samples that are most likely to be majority. Given data and methods in hand, we argue that oversampling in its current forms and methodologies is unreliable for learning from class imbalanced data and should be avoided in real-world applications.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic

The classic win-win has a key flaw in that it cannot offer the parties the right amounts of winning because each party believes they are winners. In reality, one party may win more than the other. This strategy is not limited to a single product or negotiation; it may be applied to a variety of situations in life. We present a novel way to measure the win-win situation in this paper. The proposed method employs Fuzzy logic to create a mathematical model that aids negotiators in quantifying their winning percentages. The model is put to the test on real-life negotiations scenarios such as the Iraqi-Jordanian oil deal, and the iron ore negotiation (2005-2009). The presented model has shown to be a useful tool in practice and can be easily generalized to be utilized in other domains as well.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2015

On Enhancing The Performance Of Nearest Neighbour Classifiers Using Hassanat Distance Metric

We showed in this work how the Hassanat distance metric enhances the performance of the nearest neighbour classifiers. The results demonstrate the superiority of this distance metric over the traditional and most-used distances, such as Manhattan distance and Euclidian distance. Moreover, we proved that the Hassanat distance metric is invariant to data scale, noise and outliers. Throughout this work, it is clearly notable that both ENN and IINC performed very well with the distance investigated, as their accuracy increased significantly by 3.3% and 3.1% respectively, with no significant advantage of the ENN over the IINC in terms of accuracy. Correspondingly, it can be noted from our results that there is no optimal algorithm that can solve all real-life problems perfectly; this is supported by the no-free-lunch theorem

cs.LG↗