arXiv subjects

Hannan Cao

Publications and source records attributed to Hannan Cao.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

OneTrans-V2: Unifying Retrieval, Pre-rank, and Fine-rank with One Transformer in Industrial Recommender

Industrial recommendation systems typically operate as a \emph{cascade} of retrieval, pre-rank, and fine-rank, but these stages are usually trained and served as separate models, causing repeated user-sequence encoding, isolated optimization, and duplicated engineering effort. Building on OneTrans' model-level unification, we present OneTrans-V2, one Transformer that unifies the entire cascade. It encodes the user behavior sequence once as a shared context while preserving stage-specific candidate features and computation. Joint training lets the three stages reinforce one another and enables in-model knowledge distillation from fine-rank to pre-rank. We scale the shared backbone with sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE), which increases capacity with bounded activated computation, and stabilize scaling with $μ$P-style parameterization. To consolidate objective-specific retrieval channels, we introduce Decision-Conditioned Generative Retrieval (DCGR). DCGR predicts a decision prefix describing the upcoming interaction and generates items conditioned on it, allowing business objectives to steer a single generative process. Finally, Sequence-Native Training (SNT) organizes training around each user's lifelong behavior sequence and amortizes its encoding across exposures. Deployed across all three stages of a large-scale industrial recommendation system, OneTrans-V2 improves gross merchandise value (GMV) by 9.74\% and, with a co-designed serving stack, delivers $3.2\times$ the throughput of the cascade it replaces under the same hardware budget.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2025

Reinforcement Learning Foundations for Deep Research Systems: A Survey

Deep research systems, agentic AI that solve complex, multi-step tasks by coordinating reasoning, search across the open web and user files, and tool use, are moving toward hierarchical deployments with a Planner, Coordinator, and Executors. In practice, training entire stacks end-to-end remains impractical, so most work trains a single planner connected to core tools such as search, browsing, and code. While SFT imparts protocol fidelity, it suffers from imitation and exposure biases and underuses environment feedback. Preference alignment methods such as DPO are schema and proxy-dependent, off-policy, and weak for long-horizon credit assignment and multi-objective trade-offs. A further limitation of SFT and DPO is their reliance on human defined decision points and subskills through schema design and labeled comparisons. Reinforcement learning aligns with closed-loop, tool-interaction research by optimizing trajectory-level policies, enabling exploration, recovery behaviors, and principled credit assignment, and it reduces dependence on such human priors and rater biases. This survey is, to our knowledge, the first dedicated to the RL foundations of deep research systems. It systematizes recent work along three axes: (i) data synthesis and curation; (ii) RL methods for agentic research covering stability, sample efficiency, long context handling, reward and credit design, multi-objective optimization, and multimodal integration; and (iii) agentic RL training systems and frameworks. We also cover agent architecture and coordination, as well as evaluation and benchmarks, including recent QA, VQA, long-form synthesis, and domain-grounded, tool-interaction tasks. We distill recurring patterns, surface infrastructure bottlenecks, and offer practical guidance for training robust, transparent deep research agents with RL.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is the task of automatically detecting and correcting errors in text. The task not only includes the correction of grammatical errors, such as missing prepositions and mismatched subject-verb agreement, but also orthographic and semantic errors, such as misspellings and word choice errors respectively. The field has seen significant progress in the last decade, motivated in part by a series of five shared tasks, which drove the development of rule-based methods, statistical classifiers, statistical machine translation, and finally neural machine translation systems which represent the current dominant state of the art. In this survey paper, we condense the field into a single article and first outline some of the linguistic challenges of the task, introduce the most popular datasets that are available to researchers (for both English and other languages), and summarise the various methods and techniques that have been developed with a particular focus on artificial error generation. We next describe the many different approaches to evaluation as well as concerns surrounding metric reliability, especially in relation to subjective human judgements, before concluding with an overview of recent progress and suggestions for future work and remaining challenges. We hope that this survey will serve as comprehensive resource for researchers who are new to the field or who want to be kept apprised of recent developments.

cs.CL↗