Haozhe Luo | Search arXiv

arXiv2026

Mechanist: AI as a Scientific Instrument for Discovering the Mechanisms of Intelligence

AI models are increasingly used in scientific discovery and human decision-making. Yet how AI models work and what risks they pose remain poorly understood. As AI development becomes faster and more automated, research on the mechanisms underlying AI remains largely manual. To bridge this gap, we introduce Mechanist, an agentic system that uses AI as a scientific instrument for the autonomous discovery of mechanisms underlying AI. To ground novel mechanism hypotheses, we construct a scientific knowledge graph of 13,000 studies on AI mechanisms, alongside a multidisciplinary database of 43 million papers spanning 26 fields. For reliable experiment execution, we curate a library of 32 foundational methods for mechanism analysis. Compared with Claude Code and existing AI-scientist systems, Mechanist generates higher-quality mechanism hypotheses and executes experiments more reliably. Across four case studies, Mechanist autonomously discovers new model behaviors and their underlying mechanisms, and translates these discoveries into mechanism-guided interventions and interdisciplinary design. Specifically, Mechanist first uncovers a counterintuitive safety risk in scientific laboratories, showing that unsafe traits can transfer to fine-tuned student models through apparently safe training data and emerge across modalities. Mechanist then develops a mechanism theory of belief, revealing how models represent world knowledge, form beliefs, infer the beliefs of others, and how these mechanisms emerge during pretraining. Building on this theory, Mechanist develops targeted interventions that improve model performance across diverse scenarios. Finally, Mechanist can also advance interdisciplinary discovery through mechanistic design, providing an alternative to the computationally intensive generate-and-rerank paradigm.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

SocialReasonBench: A Video-QA Benchmark for Social Reasoning with Counterfactual Narrative Videos

Recent advances in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have greatly improved video understanding, yet their ability to reason about human-centered social situations remains limited. Existing benchmarks typically rely on videos with a single observed trajectory, making it difficult to determine whether models truly understand social dynamics or merely exploit recurring narrative patterns. We introduce SocialReasonBench, a video multiple-choice QA benchmark for evaluating socially grounded reasoning in scenarios derived from interactive narratives. Built from gameplay videos of Detroit: Become Human, the benchmark leverages branching storylines where player decisions lead to alternative social outcomes that can be checked against the game's own script, flowchart, and recorded branches. We develop a multi-agent curation pipeline that localizes socially meaningful clips, grounds answer labels in game-state signals, and generates theory-guided questions with diagnostic distractors. SocialReasonBench covers seven reasoning dimensions, including intent recognition, emotional empathy, moral dilemma, counterfactual reasoning, and causal antecedent. Experiments on contemporary LMMs show that models perform reasonably well on basic social understanding but struggle with counterfactual and causal reasoning. Further ablation and diagnostic error analyses reveal that models often depend on incomplete modality cues and fall into reasoning traps such as visual shortcuts, highlighting a gap between observable event recognition and deeper reasoning over latent social states.

cs.CL↗