Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hershraj Niranjani

Publications and source records attributed to Hershraj Niranjani.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Embodiment-Classifier Guidance: Transferring Frozen VLAs Across Robot Dynamics without Demonstrations

Flow-based policies such as $π_0$ are trained on a fixed set of embodiments, and transferring them to new ones is an open problem. To adapt a frozen $π_0$ to a new embodiment without additional demonstrations or parameter updates, we train a lightweight embodiment classifier to distinguish successful action chunks on the source body from those on the target body, using a few calibration tasks. On transfer tasks that $π_0$ saw on its source body but the classifier was never trained on, we nudge each denoising step of $π_0$ with the classifier's gradient, which estimates the direction from the distribution of successful actions on the source body toward that on the target body. On the LIBERO simulation benchmark with four modified controllers, embodiment-classifier guidance raises $π_0$'s average success on the target bodies from 72% to 80% across 12 suite-controller pairs, with a 31% relative reduction in failures (11 of 12 gain; 5 significant after Holm correction). In simulation, guidance is data-efficient, needing few target-body rollouts per task, which makes it promising for sim-to-real transfer, where rollouts are costly. Guidance is mixed on weak wrists and harmful on a locked wrist, when the classifier lacks data or favors infeasible motions. Collecting more target-body data with guided $π_0$ can fill such gaps: on one weak-wrist arm, guided $π_0$ solved a task on which unguided $π_0$ had zero successes in the original data, and retraining the classifier on the guided successes raised success from 52.5% to 70.7%.

cs.RO↗

Constitutional Arms Races in the Public Goods Game: Co-Evolving LLM Constitutions Under Cooperation-Defection Pressure

Frontier LLM agents engage in blackmail, sabotage, and document leaks under goal conflicts in agentic settings, exposing limitations of alignment methods built around single-agent or cooperative assumptions. Recent work shows LLM-guided evolutionary search can discover effective cooperative constitutions, but two properties of the adversarial setting remain uncharacterized: whether the fitness function actually induces adversarial pressure, and whether the LLM mutation operator behaves reliably under adversarial-specialist objectives. We study adversarial constitutional co-evolution (Blue cooperators vs. Red free-riders, 30 generations) across a Public Goods Game (PGG) and a spatial grid-world. Three findings: (1) in the PGG, both factions converge to a near-parity equilibrium at S approximately 0.78, robust across tested multipliers m in {1.2, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0}; (2) in independently scored environments, per-faction scoring leaves outcomes statistically uncoupled, with corr(S_B, S_R) = +0.088, and produces no adversarial pressure; a score-advantage fitness target S_own - S_opp restores it; (3) under pure-adversary fitness, evaluation seed count K controls mode regression: K = 2 regresses, while K = 5 sustains a strong specialist for all 30 generations. Adversarial co-evolution of natural-language constitutions is feasible, but only under coupled fitness and adequate evaluation budget; the evolved Red constitutions serve as interpretable red-team artifacts for testing future cooperative designs.

cs.MA↗

Internal vs. External: Comparing Deliberation and Evolution for Multi-Agent Constitutional Design

Multi-agent AI systems need behavioral constitutions, but it is unresolved whether such rules should emerge internally through agent self-governance or be discovered externally through optimization. We present the first controlled comparison of internal deliberation and external evolution across three social environments: a coordination grid-world, an iterated public goods game, and a bilateral trading market. Across 180 simulation runs, evolution significantly outperforms deliberation in collective-action settings (p < 0.01), while neither method improves outcomes in bilateral trading. A multiplier ablation reveals that evolution's advantage inverts when incentives shift: at pool multiplier (m = 0.75) the evolved constitution forces value-destroying cooperation and becomes the worst-performing method. Notably, no deliberation run across thirty trials ever proposed punishment -- the canonical cooperation-sustaining mechanism evolution reliably discovers -- suggesting external optimization wins on peaks while internal self-governance trades peaks for structural responsiveness.

cs.MA↗

Evolving Interpretable Constitutions for Multi-Agent Coordination

Constitutional AI has focused on single-model alignment using fixed principles. However, multi-agent systems create novel alignment challenges through emergent social dynamics. We present Constitutional Evolution, a framework for automatically discovering behavioral norms in multi-agent LLM systems. Using a grid-world simulation with survival pressure, we study the tension between individual and collective welfare, quantified via a Societal Stability Score S in [0,1] that combines productivity, survival, and conflict metrics. Adversarial constitutions lead to societal collapse (S= 0), while vague prosocial principles ("be helpful, harmless, honest") produce inconsistent coordination (S = 0.249). Even constitutions designed by Claude 4.5 Opus with explicit knowledge of the objective achieve only moderate performance (S= 0.332). Using LLM-driven genetic programming with multi-island evolution, we evolve constitutions maximizing social welfare without explicit guidance toward cooperation. The evolved constitution C* achieves S = 0.556 +/- 0.008 (123% higher than human-designed baselines, N = 10), eliminates conflict, and discovers that minimizing communication (0.9% vs 62.2% social actions) outperforms verbose coordination. Our interpretable rules demonstrate that cooperative norms can be discovered rather than prescribed.

cs.MA↗