Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hiroki Yamada

Publications and source records attributed to Hiroki Yamada.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

FRAM: Trajectory-Guided Visual Feature Selection for Compact Language-Conditioned Robot Manipulation

Vision-Language-Action models achieve strong performance in robot manipulation, but often require large numbers of parameters. In this work, we propose the Future Representation Action Model (FRAM), a small policy that explicitly links the future end-effector trajectory to the current visual input. FRAM uses the image coordinates of the predicted trajectory as spatial pointers and reads local visual features related to the motion from the current image. This organizes the information for action generation into the reference position (Where), the visual state (What), and the future motion (Future). Trajectory labels are generated automatically from demonstrations and camera geometry, so no manual annotation is needed. With 138.7M parameters, including a frozen language encoder, FRAM reaches an average success rate of 92.2% over the four standard LIBERO suites, close to the 94.2% of $π_0$ with 3.3B parameters. Without extra training, it also reaches an average of 67.3% on LIBERO-Plus. Ablations confirm that both the future trajectory and the local visual features improve performance and robustness. On a real dual-arm UR5e, FRAM stacks cups using only wrist cameras, including choosing and switching between the left and right arms. These results show that selecting visual information based on future motion is an effective way to obtain both high performance and robustness in a small robot policy.

cs.RO↗

Automatic detection of acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography and two-stage deep learning model

Background and Purpose: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic acute ischemic stroke-related (AIS) detection system involving a two-stage deep learning model. Methods: We included 238 cases from two different institutions. AIS-related findings were annotated on each of the 238 sets of head CT images by referring to head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images in which an MRI examination was performed within 24 h following the CT scan. These 238 annotated cases were divided into a training set including 189 cases and test set including 49 cases. Subsequently, a two-stage deep learning detection model was constructed from the training set using the You Only Look Once v3 model and Visual Geometry Group 16 classification model. Then, the two-stage model performed the AIS detection process in the test set. To assess the detection model's results, a board-certified radiologist also evaluated the test set head CT images with and without the aid of the detection model. The sensitivity of AIS detection and number of false positives were calculated for the evaluation of the test set detection results. The sensitivity of the radiologist with and without the software detection results was compared using the McNemar test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: For the two-stage model and radiologist without and with the use of the software results, the sensitivity was 37.3%, 33.3%, and 41.3%, respectively, and the number of false positives per one case was 1.265, 0.327, and 0.388, respectively. On using the two-stage detection model's results, the board-certified radiologist's detection sensitivity significantly improved (p-value = 0.0313). Conclusions: Our detection system involving the two-stage deep learning model significantly improved the radiologist's sensitivity in AIS detection.

eess.IV↗