Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Igor Holas

Publications and source records attributed to Igor Holas.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Robust estimation of inequality from binned incomes

Researchers must often estimate income inequality using data that give only the number of cases (e.g., families or households) whose incomes fall in "bins" such as $0-9,999, $10,000-14,999,..., $200,000+. We find that popular methods for estimating inequality from binned incomes are not robust in small samples, where popular methods can produce infinite, undefined, or arbitrarily large estimates. To solve these and other problems, we develop two improved estimators: the robust Pareto midpoint estimator (RPME) and the multimodel generalized beta estimator (MGBE). In a broad evaluation using US national, state, and county data from 1970 to 2009, we find that both estimators produce very good estimates of the mean and Gini, but less accurate estimates of the Theil and mean log deviation. Neither estimator is uniformly more accurate, but the RPME is much faster, which may be a consideration when many estimates must be obtained from many datasets. We have made the methods available as the rpme and mgbe commands for Stata and the binequality package for R.

stat.ME

Estimation with Binned Data

Variables such as household income are sometimes binned, so that we only know how many households fall in each of several bins such as $0-10,000, $10,000-15,000, or $200,000+. We provide a SAS macro that estimates the mean and variance of binned data by fitting the extended generalized gamma (EGG) distribution, the power normal (PN) distribution, and a new distribution that we call the power logistic (PL). The macro also implements a "best-of-breed" estimator that chooses from among the EGG, PN, and PL estimates on the basis of likelihood and finite variance. We test the macro by estimating the mean family and household incomes of approximately 13,000 US school districts between 1970 and 2009. The estimates have negligible bias (0-2%) and a root mean squared error of just 3-6%. The estimates compare favorably with estimates obtained by fitting the Dagum, generalized beta (GB2), or logspline distributions.

stat.ME