Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Ivan Khalamendyk

Publications and source records attributed to Ivan Khalamendyk.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Certified Countermodels in Profile and Incidence Fibres of Diamond-Induced Edge Partitions

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a finite loopless directed graph. Each directed two-step diamond identifies its two pairs of opposite edges, and the connected components of the resulting auxiliary graph on $E$ define a canonical partition $Π_{\mathrm{opp}}(G)$. We ask whether a finite relational certificate built from the blocks of an edge partition identifies this canonical partition. We prove the functoriality and a universal coarsening property of $Π_{\mathrm{opp}}(G)$, count its complete fixed-profile fibre and its exact radius-one transposition neighbourhood, and reduce the parity condition in the certificate to an odd closed walk in a directed $\mathbb Z_2$-gain graph. In a fixed catalogue, four labelled target-positive rows, representing three isomorphism types, each admits a noncanonical positive partition obtained by a single cross-block transposition. In one row a stronger positive comparison partition also preserves every per-vertex, fixed-role incoming and outgoing count; it arises from a 12-edge alternating trade. The corresponding incidence fibre is a singleton in the other three rows. A deterministic 64-index family of comparison partitions yields 78 bounded positives among 256 nonidentity partitions. On the same profile fibre, one member has a complete 885-element relation semigroup and no write-preserve-use certificate, giving an exact negative. Thus the certificate has genuine but intermediate selectivity: it is neither determined by block sizes nor specific to the canonical target. The claims are finite statements in computational combinatorics and are supported by explicit, independently checkable certificates.

math.CO↗

Uniformity without Projective Consistency: An Exact Counterexample for a Nested Binary Term Grammar

Let T_0={L} and T_{r+1}={L} union {N(a,b):a,b in T_r}. On the nonleaf terms E_r, require each event N(a,b) to occur after its nonleaf children, and let mu_r be the uniform measure on the linear extensions of this poset. We study the restriction rho_43 that deletes the new level-4 events while preserving the relative order of the level-3 events. We prove that the pushforward of mu_4 under rho_43 is not mu_3. Two explicit orders on the 25 level-3 events have different numbers of level-4 extensions. If b_i is the number of T_2 terms, including the leaf, seen in a prefix of length i, the number of newly released events is (i+1)^2-b_i^2. The release profile of a depth-priority order dominates that of a level order pointwise and is strictly larger for 3<=i<=15. An explicit injection between admissible interleavings therefore gives a strict analytic fiber inequality. Two algorithmically independent exact computations reproduce both 1557-digit fiber counts; their reduced ratio is 614690215260160000/479048686862260621, approximately 1.2831476885707443. The analogous restrictions through level 3 are consistent, so 4-to-3 is the first failure in this grammar. The result is specific to this grammar, uniform measures, and restriction map.

math.CO↗