Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

J. Paul Liu

Publications and source records attributed to J. Paul Liu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

ASCEND: Personal AI Agents for Autonomous Scientific Computing Across HPC Clusters and GPU Workstations

Traditional scientific computing requires researchers to translate intent into environment configuration, resource requests, and executable jobs, then diagnose failures from scheduler state and logs. We present ASCEND (Autonomous Scientific Computing Engine and Novel Discovery), an AI-powered agent interface that supports several placements of the agent and, in the arrangement used for every case here, runs it on the researcher's own laptop, reaching Slurm-managed clusters and a GPU workstation over a multiplexed authenticated connection, with site policies checked by locally executed tools. The language model agent (Claude Code or Codex, selected at each launch) is hosted remotely and proposes actions but holds no credentials. No facility-scale service is required: an account on each resource suffices, and the public installer lets users link their own clusters or workstations. We report four recorded cases: 1) The agent closed a failure-recovery loop on a planted tensor-device fault, diagnosing, repairing and resubmitting with job-level artifacts preserved. 2) It reproduced the published evaluation of a weather-forecasting model from released forecasts, recovering an evaluation protocol the paper does not fully state and matching the published curves to 2.1 percent on z500 and 2.4 percent on t850. 3) It parallelized a released 12,693-line geophysical solver under a requirement of bit-for-bit identity with the serial build, cutting runtime from about twelve hours to two. 4) That requirement exposed two instances of undefined behaviour in the solver; both were repaired and reported upstream. Separately, the deployed policy validator rejected 29 of 30 constructed violations and held the last for approval, while denying 3 of 14 legitimate requests. Autonomy was exercised under author supervision using the Claude Code runtime; a controlled end-to-end recovery benchmark remains outstanding.

cs.DC↗

Beyond Tool Adoption: A Practical Five-Stage Developmental Continuum for AI Literacy in Higher Education

Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly recognized as a foundational competency for all university graduates. Yet students' engagement with AI tools often clusters at two extremes: avoidance driven by fear, mistrust, ethical concern, or lack of access, and uncritical reliance that produces fluent output while masking misunderstanding. Existing AI literacy frameworks provide valuable competency definitions, but most offer limited guidance for diagnosing where learners begin and how they progress toward responsible, critical engagement. This paper proposes a five-stage AI Literacy Continuum: 0) Not Yet Engaged, 1) Uncritical Use, 2) Informed Use, 3) Critical Evaluation, and 4) Improvement --that describes developmental orientations toward AI use in higher education. The continuum complements dimensional frameworks by providing educators with a practical diagnostic and instructional pathway aligned with international frameworks, including UNESCO and OECD. We present a design-based implementation case from North Carolina State University, where credit-bearing courses and intensive hands-on workshops engaged more than 330 participants between Fall 2024 and Spring 2026. Because the implementation did not use a validated pre/post instrument or comparison group, we frame the findings as observational and practice-based: participants exhibited behaviors consistent with movement from non-engagement or uncritical use toward informed engagement, while sustained and discipline-embedded experiences produced stronger evidence of critical evaluation and improvement-oriented practice. We discuss curricular pathways, opportunity considerations, assessment strategies, and argue that AI literacy should be understood not as tool adoption alone but as a developmental capacity to understand, evaluate, and responsibly apply AI systems in disciplinary and societal contexts.

cs.CY↗