Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jan Novotny

Publications and source records attributed to Jan Novotny.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Herding and Liquidity in Order-Book Markets. III. Leverage and the Onset of Endogenous Liquidity Crises under Weak Anchoring

Fundamental-value anchoring of resting liquidity is a causal stabiliser of an order-book market: while the anchor holds, even a heavily leveraged book stays quiet. We take that anchor strength as a continuous control and characterise the endogenous liquidity crises that appear once it is nearly removed. In a single continuous-double-auction market driven by anchored noise traders, chartist herders, a population of funding-constrained market makers, and leveraged holders subject to margin calls, no exogenous shock is injected, so that any crisis is self-generated. Weakening the anchor turns on both classical leverage stylised facts: the return tail exponent falls from about 6.5 to 2.3 and the integrated volatility autocorrelation roughly doubles, although the clustering is short-memory rather than the long-memory of real markets. Isolating the crisis as a matched-herding levered-minus-unlevered book-depletion increment, we find it confined to a narrow region of weak anchor and intermediate herding, in which more leverage always deepens the crisis. Its onset is governed not by leverage alone but by the margin buffer, the price fall a holder can absorb before a forced sale, set jointly by leverage and the maintenance margin: the two-parameter leverage-margin plane collapses, to leading order, onto this single buffer, so that tightening the maintenance margin is as destabilising as raising leverage. The onset is a smooth, sub-critical crossover: the ignition probability rises gradually, a run-length test reveals no latent sharp tipping, and a branching-ratio proxy stays bounded well below unity.

q-fin.TR

Herding and Liquidity in Order-Book Markets. II. Fundamental Anchoring and the Resilience of Liquidity

An order-book market whose liquidity provision is anchored to a fundamental value carries a restoring force: the price mean-reverts to value and the book refills after a shock. We show this restoring force is a robust intrinsic stabiliser and identify it causally-dialling the anchor down removes the mean-reversion, and a leverage-driven fire-sale then self-sustains. Separately, we ask whether a stressed market transmits its liquidity stress to a coupled calmer one, and find that it cannot: across six transmission channels of increasing strength-cross-market herding, arbitrage flow, and market-maker withdrawal up to a funding-constrained population fire-sale and a leverage spiral-the receiver's stress is independent of whether its neighbour is stressed, at every anchor strength. Market-maker withdrawal thins the receiving book but does not ignite it. Our order parameter throughout is the one-sidedness of the book-liquidity stress rather than a directional price crash-so a liquidity crisis here means the sustained one-sidedness a failing anchor produces. A liquidity crisis in this model is a failure of fundamental anchoring, not of market making.

q-fin.TR

Herding and Liquidity in Order-Book Markets. I. A Robust Liquidity-Stress Crossover and its Reflexive Mechanism

Agent-based models of markets readily produce emergent instabilities, but telling a genuine collective effect apart from a parameter artefact takes discipline. We apply Bouchaud's phase-diagram method to a continuous-double-auction order-book model. The method is to map the full phase diagram, test its robustness to rule changes, and rule out degenerate and numerical origins before we call any feature a tipping point. The model has fundamental-anchored zero-intelligence liquidity and a mid-anchored chartist herding layer, controlled by the fraction $φ$ and the strength $κ$ of herders. A 7x6 grid (336 runs, each with a scrambled-sign null) locates an emergent liquidity-stress crossover. The order parameter, the fraction of events with a one-sided book, rises to about 0.34 at $(φ,κ)=(0.9,1.0)$, is zero across all 42 scrambled cells, and forms a smooth crossover rather than a discontinuous Dark Corner. The dry-up is rule-robust (it recurs under an order-flow-imbalance rule), horizon-robust (about 0.32-0.35 across a 16x range of momentum window), and has a monotone onset boundary $φ^*(κ) = \{0.55, 0.45, 0.36\}$. We then decompose the mechanism at a matched directional-bias amplitude (mean |p_buy - 0.5| about 0.269). Price-momentum herding carries a large, comparator-robust reflexive component (+0.29; buying begets buying), whereas the order-flow rule's component is about 0 and comparator-dependent. The RMS-mispricing gradient is a placement artefact, largest at $κ=0$. A companion two-market analysis finds no directional cross-market contagion across a signal-only herding link.

q-fin.TR