Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Karim Chaira

Publications and source records attributed to Karim Chaira.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Proximinal sets and connectedness in graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with a vertex set $V$. The graph $G$ is path-proximinal if there are a semimetric $d \colon V \times V \to [0, \infty[$ and disjoint proximinal subsets of the semimetric space $(V, d)$ such that $V = A \cup B$, and vertices $u$, $v \in V$ are adjacent iff \[ d(u, v) \leqslant \inf \{d(x, y) \colon x \in A, y \in B\}, \] and, for every $p \in V$, there is a path connecting $A$ and $B$ in $G$, and passing through $p$. It is shown that a graph is path-proximinal if and only if all its vertices are not isolated. It is also shown that a graph is simultaneously proximinal and path-proximinal for an ultrametric if and only if the degree of every its vertex is equal to $1$.

math.GN↗

Bipartite graphs and best proximity pairs

We say that a bipartite graph $G(A, B)$ with fixed parts $A$, $B$ is proximinal if there is a semimetric space $(X, d)$ such that $A$ and $B$ are disjoint proximinal subsets of $X$ and all edges $\{a, b\}$ satisfy the equality $d(a, b) = \operatorname{dist}(A, B)$. It is proved that a bipartite graph $G$ is not isomorphic to any proximinal graph iff $G$ is finite and empty. It is also shown that the subgraph induced by all non-isolated vertices of a nonempty bipartite graph $G$ is a disjoint union of complete bipartite graphs iff $G$ is isomorphic to a nonempty proximinal graph for an ultrametric space.

math.CO↗

On Caristi fixed point theorem for set-valued mappings

The aim of this paper is to discuss Penot's problem on a generalization of Caristi's fixed point theorem. We settle this problem in the negative and we present some new theorems on the existence of fixed points of set-valued mappings in ordered metric spaces.

math.FA↗

Best proximity points in ultrametric spaces

In the present paper, we study the existence of best proximity pair in ultrametric spaces. We show, under suitable assumptions, that the proximinal pair $(A,B)$ has a best proximity pair. As a consequence we generalize a well known best approximation result and we derive some fixed point theorems. Moreover, we provide examples to illustrate the obtained results.

math.FA↗