Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Mar Gonzàlez I Català

Publications and source records attributed to Mar Gonzàlez I Català.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The Stepwise Informativeness Assumption: When Do Entropy Dynamics Track Reasoning Correctness in LLMs?

Recent work uses entropy-based signals at multiple representation levels to study reasoning in large language models, but the field remains largely empirical. From a theoretical perspective, reductions in model uncertainty do not necessarily reflect progress toward correctness. In this work, we characterize when such alignment can be expected through the Stepwise Informativeness Assumption (SIA), which requires entropy-reducing reasoning-prefix extensions increase the probability assigned to valid answers in expectation. We show that next-token prediction can transfer answer-relevant information from training data to the model, but does not, by itself, guarantee alignment with correctness. Instead, we propose that this alignment depends on how the training regime couples reasoning traces to correct answers. Furthermore, we hypothesize observable signatures of this phenomenon and characterize its expected failure regimes. We empirically investigate how entropy dynamics relate to correctness across four reasoning benchmarks (GSM8K, ARC, SVAMP, MATH) and diverse open-weight language models spanning base, instruction-tuned, and RL-trained regimes. Our results show that entropy-correctness alignment strengthens with post-training but can weaken when task difficulty exceeds model capabilities.

cs.CL↗

Graph Transductive Sharpening: Leveraging Unlabeled Predictions in Node Classification

In the transductive setting, where the full graph is observed but node labels are only partially available, progress in semi-supervised node classification has largely focused on architectural innovation. In this paper, we revisit an orthogonal axis: the training objective. We start from a simple observation: transductive models produce predictions for every node during training, including nodes without labels. These unlabeled-node predictions may contain useful training signal, but standard supervised objectives discard them because no ground-truth labels are available. Inspired by the decomposition of cross-entropy into a label-dependent alignment term and a label-independent entropy term, we propose prediction confidence as a natural way to extract this signal in the absence of labels. This motivates Transductive Sharpening (TS): a loss-level modification that minimizes prediction entropy on unlabeled nodes while counterbalancing this effect on labeled nodes. We evaluate Transductive Sharpening across a wide range of node-classification benchmarks and observe consistent performance improvements without requiring any changes to the backbone architecture. Code is available at https://github.com/transductive-sharpening/tunedGNN.

cs.LG↗

Diagnosing GNN Failure Modes with Layer-Wise Probe Entropy

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are typically evaluated only at their final layer, obscuring how task-relevant information evolves during message passing. We introduce a post-hoc diagnostic that freezes a trained GNN, fits an independent linear probe to each layer, and tracks probe accuracy alongside normalized predictive entropy. Across real and synthetic graph settings, layer-wise probe entropy distinguishes beneficial, neutral, and harmful smoothing, a capability not demonstrated by existing geometric measures. Moreover, by comparing shallow and deep models, we show that the onset of entropy degradation separates the two main GNN failure modes: structural mismatch under heterophily, which appears from the earliest layers even in shallow models, and excessive-depth oversmoothing, which emerges only as propagation depth increases. These results establish probe-entropy trajectories as a tool for analyzing information flow in GNNs and motivate future work on adaptive depth selection and early-exit mechanisms.

cs.LG↗

Answer-Distribution Trajectories: A Stochastic-Dynamics View of LLM Reasoning

Chain-of-thought reasoning provides a structured computation between a model's input and final answer. Yet it is often evaluated through endpoint accuracy, which ignores the path taken to reach that answer. An emerging line of work addresses this limitation using entropy profiles, which track how uncertainty evolves over the reasoning process but do not reveal which competing hypotheses account for that uncertainty. We introduce answer-distribution trajectories, a stochastic-dynamics-inspired representation that tracks the model's full predictive distribution over answers as reasoning unfolds. As a strictly finer representation than endpoint and entropy summaries, answer-distribution trajectories enable us to characterize a trace through a dynamical reasoning profile spanning exploration, revision, motion, and commitment, and to distinguish different dynamical mechanisms of reasoning success and failure. Across sixteen open-weight language models and four reasoning benchmarks, we show that traces with the same endpoint and similar entropy profiles can exhibit substantially different reasoning dynamics. We further find substantial variation in these dynamics both within and across models and tasks, with different objectives favoring different dynamical profiles. Additionally, we show that training and inference choices systematically reshape these profiles. Our results suggest that answer-distribution trajectories provide a rich framework for analysing and evaluating the dynamics of LLM reasoning.

cs.AI↗