Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Marek Jarnicki

Publications and source records attributed to Marek Jarnicki.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2013

A counterexample to a theorem of Bremermann on Shilov boundaries

We give a counterexample to the following theorem of Bremermann on Shilov boundaries: if $D$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb C^n$ having a univalent envelope of holomorphy, say $\widetilde D$, then the Shilov boundary of $D$ with respect to the algebra $\mathcal A(D)$ coincides with the corresponding one for $\widetilde D$.

math.CV↗
arXiv2013

A note on envelopes of holomorphy

Let $p:X\longrightarrow M$ be a Riemann domain over a connected $n$-dimensional complex submanifold $M$ of $\mathbb C^N$ and let $\mathcal F\subset\mathcal O(X)$ be such that $p\in\mathcal F^N$. Our aim is to discuss relations between the $\mathcal F$-envelope of holomorphy of $(X,p)$ in the sense of Riemann domains over $M$ and the $\mathcal F$-envelope of holomorphy of $X$ in the sense of complex manifolds.

math.CV↗
arXiv2008

An elementary proof of the cross theorem in the Reinhardt case

We present an elementary proof of the cross theorem in the case of Reinhardt domains. The results illustrates the well-known interrelations between the holomorphic geometry of a Reinhardt domain and the convex geometry of its logarithmic image.

math.CV↗
arXiv2005

A remark on separate holomorphy

Let $X$ be a Riemann domain over $\mathbb C^k\times\mathbb C^\ell$. If $X$ is domain of holomorphy with respect to a family $\mathcal F\subset\mathcal O(X)$, then there exists a pluripolar set $P\subset\mathcal C^k$ such that every slice $X_a$ of $X$ with $a\notin P$ is a domain of holomorphy with respect to the family $\{f|_{X_a}: f\in\mathcal F\}$.

math.CV↗
arXiv2002

An extension theorem for separately meromorphic functions with pluripolar singularities

Let $D_j\subset\mathbb C^{n_j}$ be a pseudoconvex domain and let $A_j\subset D_j$ be a locally pluriregular set, $j=1,...,N$. Put $$ X:=\bigcup_{j=1}^N A_1\times...\times A_{j-1}\times D_j\times A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N. $$ Let $M\subset X$ be relatively closed. For any $j\in\{1,...,N\}$ let $Σ_j$ be the set of all $(z',z'')\in(A_1\times...\times A_{j-1})\times(A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N)$ such that the fiber $M_{(z',\cdot,z'')}:=\{z_j\in\mathbb C^{n_j}: (z',z_j,z'')\in M\}$ is not pluripolar. Assume that $Σ_1,...,Σ_N$ are pluripolar. Put ${multline*} X':=\bigcup_{j=1}^N\{(z',z_j,z'')\in(A_1\times...\times A_{j-1})\times D_j \times(A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N): (z',z'')\notinΣ_j\}$. Then there exists a relatively closed pluripolar subset $\widetilde M\subset\widetilde X$ of the `envelope of holomorphy' $\widetilde X$ of $X$ such that: $\bullet$ $\widetilde M\cap X'\subset M$, $\bullet$ every function $f$ separately meromorphic on $X\setminus M$ extends to a (uniquely determined) function $\widetilde f$ meromorphic on $\widetilde X\setminus\widetilde M$, $\bullet$ if $f$ is separately holomorphic on $X\setminus M$, then $\widetilde f$ is holomorphic on $\widetilde X\setminus\widetilde M$, and $\bullet$ $\widetilde M$ is singular with respect to the family of all functions $\widetilde f$. \noindent In the case where N=2, $M=\varnothing$, the above result may be strengthened.

math.CV↗
arXiv2002

An extension theorem for separately holomorphic functions with pluripolar singularities

Let $D_j\subset\Bbb C^{n_j}$ be a pseudoconvex domain and let $A_j\subset D_j$ be a locally pluriregular set, $j=1,...,N$. Put $$ X:=\bigcup_{j=1}^N A_1\times...\times A_{j-1}\times D_j\times A_{j+1}\times ...\times A_N\subset\Bbb C^{n_1}\times...\times\Bbb C^{n_N}=\Bbb C^n. $$ Let $U\subset\Bbb C^n$ be an open neighborhood of $X$ and let $M\subset U$ be a relatively closed subset of $U$. For $j\in\{1,...,N\}$ let $Σ_j$ be the set of all $(z',z'')\in(A_1\times...\times A_{j-1}) \times(A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N)$ for which the fiber $M_{(z',\cdot,z'')}:=\{z_j\in\Bbb C^{n_j}\: (z',z_j,z'')\in M\}$ is not pluripolar. Assume that $Σ_1,...,Σ_N$ are pluripolar. Put $$ X':=\bigcup_{j=1}^N\{(z',z_j,z'')\in(A_1\times...\times A_{j-1})\times D_j \times(A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N)\: (z',z'')\notinΣ_j\}. $$ Then there exists a relatively closed pluripolar subset $\hat M\subset\hat X$ of the `envelope of holomorphy' $\hat X\subset\Bbb C^n$ of $X$ such that: $\hat M\cap X'\subset M$, for every function $f$ separately holomorphic on $X\setminus M$ there exists exactly one function $\hat f$ holomorphic on $\hat X\setminus\hat M$ with $\hat f=f$ on $X'\setminus M$, and $\hat M$ is singular with respect to the family of all functions $\hat f$. Some special cases were previously studied in \cite{Jar-Pfl 2001c}.

math.CV↗
arXiv2001

An extension theorem for separately holomorphic functions with singularities

Let $D_j\subset\Bbb C^{k_j}$ be a pseudoconvex domain and let $A_j\subset D_j$ be a locally pluripolar set, $j=1,...,N$. Put$$X:=\bigcup_{j=1}^N A_1\times...\times A_{j-1}\times D_j\times A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N\subset\Bbb C^{k_1+...+k_N}.$$Let $U$ be an open connected neighborhood of $X$ and let $M\varsubsetneq U$ be an analytic subset. Then there exists an analytic subset $\hat M$ of the `envelope of holomorphy' $\hat X$ of $X$ with $\hat M\cap X\subset M$ such that for every function $f$ separately holomorphic on $X\setminus M$ there exists an $\hat f$ holomorphic on $\hat X\setminus\hat M$ with $\hat f|_{X\setminus M}=f$. The result generalizes special cases which were studied in \cite{Ökt 1998}, \cite{Ökt 1999}, \cite{Sic 2000}, and \cite{Jar-Pfl 2001}.

math.CV↗
arXiv2001

Cross theorem

Let $D, G\subset{\Bbb C}$ be domains, let $A\subset D$, $B\subset G$ be locally regular sets, and let $X:=(D\times B)\cup(A\times G)$. Assume that $A$ is a Borel set. Let $M$ be a proper analytic subset of an open neighborhood of $X$. Then there exists a pure 1-dimensional analytic subset $\hat M$ of the envelope of holomorphy $\hat X$ of $X$ such that any function separately holomorphic on $X\setminus M$ extends to a holomorphic function on $\hat X\setminus\hat M$. The result generalizes special cases which were studied in \cite{Ökt 1998}, \cite{Ökt 1999a}, and \cite{Sic 2000}.

math.CV↗