Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Miguel A. Aguilo

Publications and source records attributed to Miguel A. Aguilo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Structure-preserving reduced-order models of thin panels in supersonic and hypersonic flow

We build structure-preserving reduced-order models for both challenge problems of the AePW-4 High-Speed Working Group. They are a clamped thin panel at Mach 1.92 (RC-19) and a cantilever plate at Mach 5.85 (HyMAX). The published data for each case hold no time-resolved response and no repeated runs. The physics must therefore be carried by the form of the model. One construction gives two models per problem. A Ritz-Galerkin reference model describes the plate. A learned model keeps the reference model's exact potential, fits the remaining generalized forces, and trains only a dissipation that cannot add energy. Its energy balance holds for any weights by construction. On the trained model the worst relative residual is 2.2e-15. On RC-19, shock relations predict a pressure ratio of 1.521 across the panel. Pressure-sensitive paint measured the same value. Thirty runs of the learned model place the mean dominant frequency within 1.0% of the measured 236 Hz. At one periodic and one chaotic condition, the learned model reproduces the response regime of a published reduced-order model in all sixteen runs. It does so without that model's 113 Hz spectral peak, which the measurements do not show. Measured displacements can also correct the chaotic response through one more force that respects the energy balance. We tested this on synthetic data at the experiment's 5 kHz sampling rate. The state error is 1.25% of the panel thickness without noise and 3.5% with 10 micrometers of noise. On HyMAX the learned model follows the reference model's trailing-edge displacement for 65 ms with a relative error of 3.7%. These results show that a model whose structure carries the physics can match measured flutter behavior when the available data cannot train it.

cs.CE↗

Topology optimization of shipboard components for Navy shock certification via the Dynamic Design Analysis Method

Shipboard equipment must survive the transient loads of underwater explosions. The U.S. Navy certifies such equipment with the Dynamic Design Analysis Method (DDAM), a modal response analysis driven by Navy shock design spectra. DDAM is well established as a verification tool, yet it is rarely used as a design driver in topology optimization. The design spectrum depends on the modal mass, a non-smooth coupling that classical sensitivity formulations do not address. This paper presents a complete differentiable formulation of the DDAM criterion for gradient-based topology optimization. Eigenvalue sensitivities follow the Fox-Kapoor method, and eigenvector sensitivities follow Nelson's method. The chain rule covers a spectral displacement that depends on both the natural frequency and the modal participation factor. Automatic differentiation assembles the sensitivity, and the engineer can certify components inside the optimization loop rather than after design. Three certification problems on a representative shipboard equipment frame demonstrate the workflow. In each, the optimizer removes 43.2% to 46.1% of the design-domain material and holds the certifying NRL Sum within 0.41% of the Navy allowable. Two companion studies follow. A compliance-optimized frame of nearly the same mass has a 5.2 Hz fundamental, outside the range the certification can qualify. Its nominal response also exceeds the allowable by a factor of 2.75. A lower bound on the mean of the two lowest eigenvalues separates the repeated pair that the demonstrations drive onto the frequency floor. The response then stops oscillating across the acceptance boundary. It ends at most 0.5% above the allowable, at a cost of under two percentage points of volume fraction.

cs.CE↗