Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nasibeh Mohammadzadeh

Publications and source records attributed to Nasibeh Mohammadzadeh.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Authority-Bound Governance of Heterogeneous AI Security Decisions in Telecom and IoT Networks

Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled security decision systems in telecom and IoT networks can draw on heterogeneous models whose outputs may trigger operational actions. Recording such decisions on a blockchain does not establish that they are authorised, applicable, policy-consistent, or still valid at execution time. This paper presents governance-2, an authority-bound and fail-closed architecture that separates upstream scientific decision formation from downstream operational enforcement. Each governed case is bound to registered dataset, model, policy, deployment, and optional refiner authorities. Smart-contract checks enforce role separation, authority compatibility, score-to-state and state-to-action consistency, lifecycle validity, replay protection, pause control, authority revocation, and exact-action execution. Evaluation uses two independent branches: a controlled spectrum-access replay with four frozen heterogeneous decision configurations and a measured radio-frequency branch based on WiFiSpectralJam. Across eight frozen measured-data decision streams, governance-2 processes 153,744 stream-case instances derived from 19,218 measured captures while preserving interference-specific semantics and unresolved review states. The full contract rejects all tested invalid operations; stateful invariant testing completes 2,000 generated transaction sequences with zero invariant violations; and single-capability ablation shows that removing an enforcement family exposes its assigned invalid operations while unrelated protections remain active. The results indicate that heterogeneous AI security decisions can share a common governance plane across telecom and IoT settings without redefining their scientific semantics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

When Does AI Supervision Help? A Role-Aware Study of Network Fraud Decision Management with Blockchain Auditability

When does a second artificial intelligence (AI) component improve a primary network-fraud decision rather than add operational burden? We study this question through a role-aware Decider-Supervisor (DS) framework with blockchain auditability, evaluating four directional configurations that combine centralised machine learning, a Federated Averaging (FedAvg)-trained federated meta-model, and Base or Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) large language model variants. The analysis compares primary-only and supervised decisions using non-hard fraud performance, intervention burden, conditional calibration, traffic-mix and Review-capacity sensitivity, dependability tests, and blockchain lifecycle controls. The deterministic hard gate resolves 89.994% of fraudulent requests, leaving the non-hard population as the main AI decision setting. Conditional validation calibration does not produce a consistently transferable supervisory advantage on deployment replay. DS-3 QLoRA is the least disruptive supervised configuration, but it still underperforms its primary FedAvg stage in F1 and total errors. Across 36 reweighted traffic mixtures, supervision reduces total errors only for DS-4 Base in two extreme high-fraud scenarios. Blockchain tests support digest verification, tamper detection, authorisation, single-use review resolution, and post-finalisation integrity, while exposing a pre-finalisation single-write limitation. The results show that the value of AI supervision depends on role assignment, calibration, escalation policy, traffic composition, and lifecycle controls rather than on the presence of a second model alone.

cs.AI↗