Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Param Upadhyay

Publications and source records attributed to Param Upadhyay.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tangled $τ$: Planck CMB Constraints on Flash Reionization

Recent cosmological tensions have renewed interest in the role of reionization in parameter inference, and flash reionization has been proposed as a transient high-redshift ionization episode that can increase the Thomson optical depth while remaining compatible with CMB polarization data. In this work, we present the first Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis of the flash reionization model fit to Planck cosmic microwave background temperature, polarization, and lensing data. We perform this analysis using Planck PR4 data in $Λ$CDM with flash reionization. We find that CMB data allow a wide range for the redshift of the flash, $z_{\rm flash}$, but with constraints that are tightly correlated with the peak ionization fraction $x_{\rm flash}$. We find constraints $x_{\rm flash}=0.24 ^{+0.13} _{-0.07}$ and $x_{\rm flash}= 0.15 ^{+0.07} _{ - 0.05}$ for the benchmark flash reionization scenarios with fixed $z_{\rm flash}=20$ and $25$ respectively. The standard $Λ$CDM parameters do not exhibit any significant shifts, and in particular, the total optical depth to reionization is not appreciably changed, with $τ=0.061 \pm 0.007$ in flash reionization as compared to $τ=0.059\pm 0.006$ in the standard tanh parametrization. We repeat this analysis for Planck PR3 data in place of PR4, and find that the mild preference for a flash is replaced by 95% CL upper bounds, given by $x_{\rm flash}<0.28$ and $x_{\rm flash}<0.18$ for $z_{\rm flash}=20$ and $25$, respectively, from Planck PR3 data.

astro-ph.CO

Black holes and up-tunneling suppress Boltzmann brains

Eternally inflating universes lead to an infinite number of Boltzmann brains but also an infinite number of ordinary observers. If we use the scale factor measure to regularize these infinities, the ordinary observers dominate the Boltzmann brains if the vacuum decay rate of each vacuum is larger than its Boltzmann brain nucleation rate. Here we point out that nucleation of small black holes should be counted in the vacuum decay rate, and this rate is always larger than the Boltzmann brain rate, if the minimum Boltzmann brain mass is more than the Planck mass. We also discuss nucleation of small, rapidly inflating regions, which may also have a higher rate than Boltzmann brains. This process also affects the distribution of the different vacua in eternal inflation.

hep-th