On the Role of Rotation Equivariance in Monocular 2D-to-3D Human Pose Lifting
We consider monocular 3D human pose estimation (HPE), where the goal is to predict 3D human skeletal joints from a single 2D image, typically via 2D keypoint detection followed by 2D-to-3D lifting. Despite their success, we find that current lifting models exhibit strong performance degradation under rotations. We systematically study rotation equivariance across lifting architectures with increasing degrees of equivariant inductive bias, and investigate whether equivariance should be enforced by architectural design or learned from data, given the inherent ambiguity of monocular 2D-to-3D lifting. Utilising common HPE benchmarks, we demonstrate that rotation equivariance can be effectively learned via rotation-based data augmentation applied jointly to input and output poses. Compared with non-augmented models, this reduces error on rotated poses by over 30% across the benchmarks, with reductions of up to 72%. Moreover, augmentation-based models achieve up to 15% lower error than methods that are fully equivariant by design, while providing up to 37$\times$ faster inference. We further show that these findings generalise to real-world human pose sequences involving full-body rotations and to a state-of-the-art HPE model.