Phannet Pov | Search arXiv

arXiv2026

Closing the Quality Gap in Low-Resource Text-to-Speech: LoRA Fine-Tuning of VoxCPM2 for Khmer and Korean

Large pretrained text-to-speech (TTS) models sound almost human for well-resourced languages, but much worse for languages that are rare in their training data. We study this quality gap for Khmer and Korean using VoxCPM2, a 2.4B parameter, tokenizer-free TTS model that joins a MiniCPM-4 language-model backbone with a flow-matching diffusion decoder. We build one shared, language-tagged corpus of 25.5 hours after cleaning and adapt VoxCPM2 with a single Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapter, trained on both languages at once and added to both the language model and the decoder. The adapter is zero-initialized, so training starts exactly at the original zero-shot model. In native-speaker listening tests, the Khmer Mean Opinion Score (MOS) rises from 3.85 to 4.23 with the best adapter, rank 64. This gain is highly significant under a paired Wilcoxon test with p < 0.001, and it is achieved while training only 0.19 to 3.03 percent of the parameters. Two findings stand out. First, the training loss and human ratings disagree on the best rank. The loss is lowest at rank 128, but MOS peaks at rank 64. Second, the same adapter gives no significant gain for Korean, which the base model already covers well, and a high rank even hurts quality. This shows that adaptation helps mainly where the base model is truly weak.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

A Comparative Study of Language Models for Khmer Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for grounding large language model (LLM) outputs in retrieved evidence, thereby reducing hallucination and improving factual accuracy. Its efficacy, however, remains largely unexamined for low-resource, non-Latin-script languages such as Khmer. In this paper, we present a RAG-based question answering system for Khmer-language telecom-domain documents. We conduct a two-phase comparative evaluation. First, we benchmark three embedding models: BGE-M3 (567M), Jina-Embeddings-v3 (570M), and Qwen3-Embedding (597M), for dense retrieval over Khmer documents. BGE-M3 consistently performs best, achieving a Hit Rate@3 of 0.285, File Hit Rate@3 of 0.700, MRR@3 of 0.221, and Precision@3 of 0.112, substantially outperforming the other retrievers. Second, using BGE-M3 as the selected retriever, we evaluate five generator backends: Qwen3 (8B), Qwen3.5 (9B), Sailor2-8B-Chat, SeaLLMs-v3-7B-Chat, and Llama-SEA-LION-v2-8B-IT, on a curated golden dataset of 200 Khmer question-answer pairs. To quantify system performance, we apply six RAGAS-inspired metrics: faithfulness, answer relevance, context relevance, factual correctness, answer similarity, and answer correctness. The results show no single model dominates across all metrics: Qwen3.5-9B achieves the highest faithfulness (0.859) and context relevance (0.726), Qwen3-8B attains the highest factual correctness (0.380), and SeaLLMs-v3-7B-Chat performs best on answer relevance (0.867), answer similarity (0.836), and answer correctness (0.599). These findings highlight that retriever choice remains a major bottleneck for Khmer RAG, while generator strengths vary depending on whether the priority is grounding, factual precision, or semantic similarity.

cs.CL↗