Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Philip Stark

Publications and source records attributed to Philip Stark.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Estimating soil carbon storage potential and approximating optimal management policies

The impact of a management intervention on the soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in a given volume of soil may be moderated by observable features that proxy that soil's SOC storage potential under that intervention. To maximize total SOC storage, interventions should be targeted to soils with the highest responses and lowest costs to intervening. We summarize key sources of uncertainty and present a causal framework for estimating SOC storage potentials and optimal management policies. The method models SOC measurements as functions of covariates within each treatment arm, using the fitted models to estimate SOC storage potential for each plot and finding the policy that maximizes the average of those estimates. The modeling can use linear regression or other machine learning algorithms to learn relationships between features and SOC storage. We demonstrate its use in a study of compost amendments applied to California rangelands, finding that storage potential is moderated by baseline SOC and that optimizing the policy could provide a slight gain over uniform application of the intervention with the largest average treatment effect estimate. We evaluate the methods further in simulated field experiments. Simple estimates fared better than machine learning, except in unrealistically large experiments. We conclude by discussing recommendations for practice, baseline SOC moderation, extensions to observational studies, and broader policy uncertainties.

stat.AP

Does Extending Polling Hours Compensate for Bomb Threats? Evidence from the 2024 Election in Georgia, USA

At least 227~bomb threats against polling places and tabulation centers were received on the day of the 2024 US presidential election. Threats disrupted voting in the swing states of Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania while law enforcement swept polling places. No bombs were found. Roughly a dozen `credible' threats were received in Georgia in DeKalb and Fulton counties, interrupting voting at eleven polling locations; there were dozens of `non-credible' threats in addition. To remediate the effect of the temporary closures of polling places, courts ordered some polling places to remain open late. Nonparametric statistical tests using turnout data from 2020 and 2024 show that this remedy may have been inadequate: in DeKalb, 2024 in-person turnout in precincts closed by threats relative to 2020 turnout in the same precincts was suppressed compared to other DeKalb polling places ($P \approx 0.01$). In Fulton, there is no statistical evidence that in-person voting was suppressed in precincts closed by bomb threats.

physics.soc-ph

End-to-end verifiability

This pamphlet describes end-to-end election verifiability (E2E-V) for a nontechnical audience: election officials, public policymakers, and anyone else interested in secure, transparent, evidence-based electronic elections. This work is part of the Overseas Vote Foundation's End-to-End Verifiable Internet Voting: Specification and Feasibility Assessment Study (E2E VIV Project), funded by the Democracy Fund.

cs.CR