Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Robert Erhardt

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Erhardt.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Three Case Studies of Two-stage MCMC for Fast Bayesian Inference of Large Spatio-temporal Data

High dimensional spatio-temporal models can quickly run up against computational limitations. Recursive or multi-stage Bayesian algorithms are one way to address this computational challenge. Here we consider an increasingly used two-stage algorithm. The first stage models locations independently and in parallel across space. Resampling particles from this stage-one model with Metropolis-within-Gibbs methods and suitably computed acceptance ratios can impose spatial dependence across locations at a low computational cost, while targeting the same posterior distribution as the single-stage MCMC algorithm at a fraction of the overall computational cost. In this paper we show three complete examples of how two-stage MCMC algorithms can be used to efficiently fit Bayesian spatio-temporal models to large datasets. Specifically, we consider: a spatio-temporal self-exciting count model on areal data utilizing intrinsic conditional autoregressive (ICAR) prior distributions; a spatio-temporal model of point-referenced data using a stationary, isotropic distance-based covariance function; and a binary model fit to data on a spatial lattice utilizing a latent Gaussian process to capture all spatio-temporal dependence. In each example, we define the model and describe the corresponding two-stage MCMC approach. We then compare the resulting posterior samples and computational efficiency with those obtained using a standard single-stage MCMC algorithm. While varying across the three examples and numerous parameters, the two-stage approach often achieves roughly an order of magnitude higher computational efficiency, with the two-stage and single-stage algorithms producing closely agreeing posterior samples.

stat.ME

Modelling extremes using approximate Bayesian Computation

By the nature of their construction, many statistical models for extremes result in likelihood functions that are computationally prohibitive to evaluate. This is consequently problematic for the purposes of likelihood-based inference. With a focus on the Bayesian framework, this chapter examines the use of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) techniques for the fitting and analysis of statistical models for extremes. After introducing the ideas behind ABC algorithms and methods, we demonstrate their application to extremal models in stereology and spatial extremes.

stat.ME