Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Roger Howe

Publications and source records attributed to Roger Howe.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2021

Ranks for Representations of GL(n) Over Finite Fields, their Agreement, and Positivity of Fourier Transform

In [Frobenius1896] it was shown that many important properties of a finite group could be examined using formulas involving the character ratios of group elements, i.e., the trace of the element acting in a given irreducible representation, divided by the dimension of the representation. In [Gurevich-Howe15] and [Gurevich-Howe17], the current authors introduced the notion of rank of an irreducible representation of a finite classical group. One of the motivations for studying rank was to clarify the nature of character ratios for certain elements in these groups. In fact in the above cited papers, two notions of rank were given. The first is the Fourier theoretic based notion of U-rank of a representation, which comes up when one looks at its restrictions to certain abelian unipotent subgroups. The second is the more algebraic based notion of tensor rank which comes up naturally when one attempts to equip the representation ring of the group with a grading that reflects the central role played by the few "smallest" possible representations of the group. In [Gurevich-Howe17] we conjectured that the two notions of rank mentioned just above agree on a suitable collection called "low rank" representations. In this note we review the development of the theory of rank for the case of the general linear group GL_n over a finite field F_q, and give a proof of the "agreement conjecture" that holds true for sufficiently large q. Our proof is Fourier theoretic in nature, and uses a certain curious positivity property of the Fourier transform of the set of matrices of low enough fixed rank in the vector space of matrices of size m x n over F_q. In order to make the story we are trying to tell clear, we choose in this note to follow a particular example that shows how one might apply the theory of rank to certain counting problems.

math.RT↗
arXiv2021

Harmonic Analysis on GL(n) over Finite Fields

There are many formulas that express interesting properties of a finite group G in terms of sums over its characters. For estimating these sums, one of the most salient quantities to understand is the character ratio trace(\pi(g)) / dim(\pi), for an irreducible representation \pi of G and an element g of G. It turns out [Gurevich-Howe15, Gurevich-Howe17] that for classical groups G over finite fields there are several (compatible) invariants of representations that provide strong information on the character ratios. We call these invariants collectively rank. Rank suggests a new way to organize the representations of classical groups over finite and local fields - a way in which the building blocks are the "smallest" representations. This is in contrast to Harish-Chandra's philosophy of cusp forms that is the main organizational principle since the 60s, and in it the building blocks are the cuspidal representations which are, in some sense, the "LARGEST". The philosophy of cusp forms is well adapted to establishing the Plancherel formula for reductive groups over local fields, and led to Lusztig's classification of the irreducible representations of such groups over finite fields. However, analysis of character ratios might benefit from a different approach. In this note we discuss further the notion of tensor rank for GL_n over a finite field F_q and demonstrate how to get information on representations of a given tensor rank using tools coming from the recently studied eta correspondence, as well as the well known philosophy of cusp forms, mentioned just above. A significant discovery so far is that although the dimensions of the irreducible representations of a given tensor rank vary by quite a lot (they can differ by large powers of q), for certain group elements of interest the character ratios of these irreps are nearly equal to each other.

math.RT↗
arXiv2021

The Pieri Rule for GLn Over Finite Fields

The Pieri rule gives an explicit formula for the decomposition of the tensor product of irreducible representation of the complex general linear group GL(n,C) with a symmetric power of the standard representation on C^n. It is an important and long understood special case of the Littlewood-Richardson rule for decomposing general tensor products of representations of GL(n,C). In our recent work [Gurevich-Howe17, Gurevich-Howe19] on the organization of representations of the general linear group over a finite field F_q using small representations, we used a generalization of the Pieri rule to the context of this latter group. In this note, we demonstrate how to derive the Pieri rule for GL(n,Fq). This is done in two steps; the first, reduces the task to the case of the symmetric group S_n, using the natural relation between the representations of S_n and the spherical principal series representations of GL(n,F_q); while in the second step, inspired by a remark of Nolan Wallach, the rule is obtained for S_n invoking the S_\ell-GL_(n,C)) Schur duality. Along the way, we advertise an approach to the representation theory of the symmetric group which emphasizes the central role played by the dominance order on Young diagrams. The ideas leading to this approach seem to appear first, without proofs, in [Howe-Moy86].

math.RT↗
arXiv2021

A look at Representations of SL(2,F_q) through the Lens of Size

How to study a nice function on the real line? The physically motivated Fourier theory technique of harmonic analysis is to expand the function in the basis of exponentials and study the meaningful terms in the expansion. Now, suppose the function lives on a finite non-commutative group G, and is invariant under conjugation. There is a well-known analog of Fourier analysis, using the irreducible characters of G. This can be applied to many functions that express interesting properties of G. To study these functions one wants to know how the different characters contribute to the sum? In this note we describe the G=SL(2,F_q) case of the theory we have been developing in recent years which attempts to give a fairly general answer to the above question for finite classical groups. The irreducible representations of SL(2,F_q) are "well known" for a very long time [Frobenius1896, Jordan1907, Schur1907] and are a prototype example in many introductory courses on the subject. We are happy that we can say something new about them. In particular, it turns out that the representations that were considered as "anomalous" in the "old" point of view (known as the "philosophy of cusp forms") are the building blocks of the current approach.

math.RT↗
arXiv2021

Rank and Duality in Representation Theory

There is both theoretical and numerical evidence that the set of irreducible representations of a reductive group over local or finite fields is naturally partitioned into families according to analytic properties of representations. Examples of such properties are the rate of decay at infinity of "matrix coefficients" in the local field setting, and the order of magnitude of "character ratios" in the finite field situation. In these notes we describe known results, new results, and conjectures in the theory of "size" of representations of classical groups over finite fields, whose ultimate goal is to classify the above mentioned families of representations and accordingly to estimate the relevant analytic properties of each family. Specifically, we treat two main issues: the first is the introduction of a rigorous definition of a notion of size for representations of classical groups, and the second issue is a method to construct and obtain information on each family of representation of a given size. In particular, we propose several compatible notions of size that we call U-RANK, TENSOR RANK and ASYMPTOTIC RANK, and we develop a method called ETA CORRESPONDENCE to construct the families of representation of each given rank. Rank suggests a new way to organize the representations of classical groups over finite and local fields - a way in which the building blocks are the "smallest" representations. This is in contrast to Harish-Chandra's philosophy of cusp forms that is the main organizational principle since the 60s, and in it the building blocks are the cuspidal representations which are, in some sense, the "LARGEST".

math.RT↗
arXiv2016

A reciprocity law and the skew Pieri rule for the symplectic group

We use the theory of skew duality to show that decomposing the tensor product of $k$ irreducible representations of the symplectic group $Sp_{2m} = Sp_{2m}(C)$ is equivalent to branching from $Sp_{2n}$ to $Sp_{2n_1}\times\cdots\times Sp_{2n_k}$ where $n, n_1,\ldots, n_k$ are positive integers such that $n = n_1+\cdots+n_k$ and the $n_j$'s depend on $m$ as well as the representations in the tensor product. Using this result and a work of J. Lepowsky, we obtain a skew Pieri rule for $Sp_{2m}$, i.e., a description of the irreducible decomposition of the tensor product of an irreducible representation of the symplectic group $Sp_{2m}$ with a fundamental representation.

math.RT↗
arXiv2016

Small Representations of Finite Classical Groups

Finite group theorists have established many formulas that express interesting properties of a finite group in terms of sums of characters of the group. An obstacle to applying these formulas is lack of control over the dimensions of representations of the group. In particular, the representations of small dimensions tend to contribute the largest terms to these sums, so a systematic knowledge of these small representations could lead to proofs of important conjectures which are currently out of reach. Despite the classification by Lusztig of the irreducible representations of finite groups of Lie type, it seems that this aspect remains obscure. In this note we develop a language which seems to be adequate for the description of the "small" representations of finite classical groups and puts in the forefront the notion of rank of a representation. We describe a method, the "eta correspondence", to construct small representations, and we conjecture that our construction is exhaustive. We also give a strong estimate on the dimension of small representations in terms of their rank. For the sake of clarity, in this note we describe in detail only the case of the finite symplectic groups.

math.RT↗
arXiv2014

Monoid Embeddings of Symmetric Varieties

We determine when an antiinvolution on an adjoint semisimple linear algebraic group extends to an antiinvolution on a $J$-irreducible monoid. Using this information, we study a special class of compactifications of symmetric varieties. Extending the work of Springer on involutions, we describe the parametrizing sets of Borel orbits in these special embeddings.

math.AG↗
arXiv2010

Unipotent Invariant Matrices

We describe the variety of fixed points of a unipotent operator acting on the space of matrices. We compute the determinant and the rank of a generic (symmetric, or anti-symmetric) matrix in the fixed variety, yielding information about the generic singular locus of the corresponding bilinear form.

math.AG↗