Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Sadhana Devarajan

Publications and source records attributed to Sadhana Devarajan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

IDSISA: Influence-Distilled Sharded Training for Efficient Machine Unlearning

Machine unlearning removes the influence of specific training examples to comply with privacy regulations. Full retraining gives strong guarantees but is computationally prohibitive at scale; approximate methods are efficient but lack formal guarantees. SISA (Sharded, Isolated, Sliced, and Aggregated training) achieves certified deletion through data sharding and independent retraining, but random partitioning scatters forget requests across most shards, and isolated retraining degrades utility. We introduce IDSISA (Influence-Distilled SISA), which uses influence functions to concentrate forget-prone samples into few shards and distillation from unaffected shards to recover utility lost to isolation. The deletion guarantee inherited from SISA's retraining step remains exact and requires no probabilistic qualification; the distillation-based utility recovery is a separately quantified, empirically bounded approximation ($ε_{\text{cert}} \leq 0.015$ in expectation). We further formalize certification under sequences of repeated deletion requests, where cross-shard distillation can create dependencies between shards; we prove that a closure-based cascading retraining procedure restores the deletion guarantee to the full aggregated model under any deletion sequence. Experiments on ResNet-18/CIFAR-10, ResNet-18/CIFAR-100, BiLSTM/IMDB, TCN/IMDB, and a fully connected network on Fashion-MNIST show $14-91\%$ better selective forgetting, up to $50\%$ better utility retention in relative terms (with consistent percentage-point gains on the other architectures, where a relative baseline is undefined), and unlearning-time changes ranging from $-6.7\%$ to $+6.4\%$ depending on architecture, relative to SISA.

cs.LG↗

Can You Break RLVER? Probing Adversarial Robustness of RL-Trained Empathetic Agents

Reinforcement learning from verifiable emotion rewards (RLVER) yields strong empathetic language models, but is evaluated with cooperative, honest simulated users. Real users gaslight, escalate, and demand unconditional validation. We introduce the Adversarial Empathy Benchmark (AEB), six adversarial trajectory types whose discriminative rewards penalize formulaic comfort, and the Emotional Consistency Score (ECS), which separates whether a model \emph{improves} the user's emotional state from whether that state stays legible in the transcript. Across eight scenario-matched conditions (480 dialogues; two RLVER and two Qwen2.5 base models, with and without thinking), RLVER-PPO-Think outperforms its untuned same-scale baseline (FS $0.979$ vs.\ $0.761$, $p<10^{-12}$) with no dialogue collapses and 53\% higher hidden-intention detection; the gain is not explained by response length. Yet under an independent cross-family judge (Gemma-3-4b-it), ECS is indistinguishable between the two ($p=0.43$). We call this an outcome--legibility dissociation: RLVER improves emotional outcomes without making the user's state more legible. We do not claim ECS measures internal understanding.

cs.AI↗

MultiAttenGastro: Multi-Dimensional Attention Augmentation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Classification

Automated gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy classification requires models that generalize across diverse modalities and class distributions, often far from natural-image pretraining. We propose MultiAttenGastro, a plug-and-play attention framework with parallel 1-D channel, 2-D spatial, and 3-D contextual heads, and present the first systematic cross-dataset evaluation across eight CNN and transformer backbones on five public GI datasets (80 backbone--dataset runs). We find that attention effectiveness is not universal but tracks the representational gap between ImageNet features and the target distribution: MultiAttenGastro improves 6 of 8 backbones on Kvasir-Capsule (14-class WCE, large gap; best macro F1 98.33\%), is uniformly negative on the small-gap Kvasir-v2 benchmark (0/8), and shows mixed outcomes on datasets with intermediate gap. Five-seed ablation on the strongest case (Kvasir-Capsule, ConvNeXt-Tiny) shows this improvement is directionally consistent, but not statistically decisive (paired $t$: $p=0.47$; Wilcoxon: $p=0.63$), and that individual attention heads are not uniformly beneficial in isolation only their combination yields a positive mean effect. Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) analysis links this pattern to representational redundancy: low inter-head CKA under large domain gaps coincides with the framework's only consistent gains, while high redundancy under small gaps coincides with its losses. We report these results, including the non-significant margins, as evidence for when and why multi-dimensional attention helps GI endoscopy classification, rather than as a claim that MultiAttenGastro is a strictly superior architectural choice.

cs.CV↗