Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Samuel A. Nastase

Publications and source records attributed to Samuel A. Nastase.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Cognitive Expert Language Models Better Align with the Corresponding Brain Systems

Large language models (LLMs) can predict human brain activity across a variety of brain regions during natural language comprehension. Typically, however, LLM-brain alignment is measured using one model for different regions of the brain, and then model performance is summarized across regions. This one-model-fits-all approach ignores the functional specialization of brain regions. In this study, we assess whether a model oriented toward a particular cognitive domain aligns better with the brain system dedicated to that domain. Through prompting and fine-tuning, we first build expert LLM variants for six domains: sensory, spatial, numerical, reasoning, social, and abstract processing. We then examine whether each expert best predicts activity in the brain region associated with the corresponding cognitive domain. Consistent with our hypotheses, each expert's representations align more closely with the brain system most associated with the matching domain than do other experts. This holds under both prompting and fine-tuning, across three base models and three fMRI datasets. In a series of control analyses, we show that this model-brain alignment is specific to cognitive domain interventions; non-cognitive and surface-level interventions do not result in comparable alignment. Specializing models shifts regional alignment while leaving aggregate prediction accuracy largely unchanged, suggesting that summarizing alignment across regions may obscure regional differences in performance for specific models.

cs.CL↗

Attention, not scale, drives human-AI alignment in multimodal language prediction

Humans routinely draw on visual context to predict upcoming words. To what extent current vision-language models produce comparable behaviour is unclear. Here we placed five state-of-the-art pretrained systems side-by-side with 600 human participants in a web-based Visual-World Paradigm. On each of 100 six-second movie clips, models and participants received either text only or synchronised video and text and judged how likely a specified target word was to appear next; human eye movements were tracked throughout. Adding visual context increased model-human alignment in predictability ratings across all architectures (average Delta r = 0.18) with no impact of parameter size. When visual context was informative, transformer attention significantly increased alignment. Attention maps from two transformer models corresponded with human gaze, explaining up to 70% of the inter-participant variance when the scene contained informative cues. Notably, cross-modal attention reliably tracked anticipatory human fixations on semantic cues. These results suggest that current transformer-based vision-language models can approximate human behaviour exploiting visual context during language prediction - and that selective attention to informative cues, not sheer model scale, is the principal driver of this alignment.

cs.AI↗

Does Conceptual Representation Require Embodiment? Insights From Large Language Models

To what extent can language alone give rise to complex concepts, or is embodied experience essential? Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) offer fresh perspectives on this question. Although LLMs are trained on restricted modalities, they exhibit human-like performance in diverse psychological tasks. Our study compared representations of 4,442 lexical concepts between humans and ChatGPTs (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) across multiple dimensions, including five key domains: emotion, salience, mental visualization, sensory, and motor experience. We identify two main findings: 1) Both models strongly align with human representations in non-sensorimotor domains but lag in sensory and motor areas, with GPT-4 outperforming GPT-3.5; 2) GPT-4's gains are associated with its additional visual learning, which also appears to benefit related dimensions like haptics and imageability. These results highlight the limitations of language in isolation, and that the integration of diverse modalities of inputs leads to a more human-like conceptual representation.

cs.CL↗

Data-Efficient Mutual Information Neural Estimator

Measuring Mutual Information (MI) between high-dimensional, continuous, random variables from observed samples has wide theoretical and practical applications. Recent work, MINE (Belghazi et al. 2018), focused on estimating tight variational lower bounds of MI using neural networks, but assumed unlimited supply of samples to prevent overfitting. In real world applications, data is not always available at a surplus. In this work, we focus on improving data efficiency and propose a Data-Efficient MINE Estimator (DEMINE), by developing a relaxed predictive MI lower bound that can be estimated at higher data efficiency by orders of magnitudes. The predictive MI lower bound also enables us to develop a new meta-learning approach using task augmentation, Meta-DEMINE, to improve generalization of the network and further boost estimation accuracy empirically. With improved data-efficiency, our estimators enables statistical testing of dependency at practical dataset sizes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our estimators on synthetic benchmarks and a real world fMRI data, with application of inter-subject correlation analysis.

cs.LG↗