Sangeetha Sivanesan | Search arXiv

arXiv2026

Vectorizing Classical Tamil: Representation Learning for Verse-Commentary Pairs

We construct a corpus of 1,262 verse--commentary (urai) pairs from five Classical Tamil source sections, ranging from technical grammatical prose to modern paraphrase, and ask what information representation learning can recover. We train recurrent and Transformer encoders, a Siamese-style pair-matching network, an mBART-style encoder--decoder, and a decoder-only language model. Each analysis is interpreted against an appropriate control on the same data. TF-IDF provides a strong no-training lexical retrieval baseline, alongside representation analyses and generation controls for the learned models. A fixed string containing the 25 most frequent commentary words scores higher on generation overlap than the decoder-only model. Canonical correlation reaches 1.000 on Gaussian noise at these sample sizes, token-F1 spans only about 0.02--0.20 on this corpus, and the encoder--decoder continues to lower training loss for sixteen epochs after validation loss has begun to rise. One narrow result remains: the decoder-only model prefers authentic word order in 107 of 112 minimal-pair comparisons (95.5%), but does not reproduce held-out commentary content. We release the extraction and evaluation protocol; redistribution of the source commentaries remains subject to permission.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Contextual Tamil Spelling and Grammar Correction Using Progressively Fine-Tuned Sequence-to-Sequence Transformers

Tamil spell and grammar correction is challenging because Tamil is an agglutinative low-resource language with rich verbal morphology, complex sandhi (phonetic transformation) rules at word boundaries, and a script of 247 distinct letters. Prior work targets word-level surface errors with rule-based methods, statistical n-gram models, Minimum Edit Distance, or hybrid pipelines with a transformer re-ranker; such methods cannot reliably handle contextual errors - subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, or cross-word sandhi - which require sentence-level understanding. We propose an end-to-end sequence-to-sequence formulation and fine-tune mT5-small and mBART-50 on a synthetic corpus of up to 657,720 noisy-clean Tamil sentence pairs spanning ten error categories. Both backbones follow the same four-stage progressive schedule, each stage targeting one weakness: surface noise (v2), contextual grammar (v3), single-site sandhi (v4), and multi-site cross-word sandhi (v5). On a 1,000-sentence balanced diagnostic set verified disjoint from all training data, our best model, mBART-50 v5, reaches 69.3% top-1 exact-match accuracy, with 87.5% on sandhi and 43.5% on subject-verb agreement. The schedule is what produces these gains: subject-verb accuracy rises from 1.0% to 52.5% once contextual pairs are introduced, and sandhi from 0% to 87.5% once multi-site sandhi pairs are. We additionally quantify a precision-recall trade-off this literature has not reported: sandhi recall is paid for monotonically in identity accuracy. Finally, Tamil-LLaMA-7B-Instruct reaches 19.0% zero-shot and 24.7% with three demonstrations against a 20.0% copy baseline, showing that a Tamil-adapted instruction model does not transfer to specialised sentence-level correction without task-specific supervision.

cs.CL↗