Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Shantanu Singh

Publications and source records attributed to Shantanu Singh.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

JUMP-lite: Compact, reproducible benchmarking of cell representations

Image-based profiling captures rich phenotypic signatures for drug discovery and functional genomics. Large public datasets like JUMP Cell Painting now provide millions of images for systematic study. However, JUMP alone occupies 115 TB, and fragmented evaluation practices make systematic comparisons of representation methods impractical for many researchers. Here we present Nahual, an open-source framework for reproducible model deployment, and JUMP-lite, a 92.0 GB subset of JUMP that is approximately 1,250-fold smaller, selected to cover genetic modalities and compound annotations and reduced via lossy JPEG XL compression. Using these resources, we benchmark five representation methods, including classical features (CellProfiler) and deep learning models (MorphEM, OpenPhenom, SubCell, DINOv2). Moderate compression broadly retains signal relative to uncompressed images. Standardized phenotypic activity and consistency metrics reveal meaningful performance differences across methods. Together, JUMP-lite and Nahual provide a foundation for accessible, reproducible benchmarking of image-based cell representations.

q-bio.QM

Science sandboxes measure the scientific capability of AI agents

Scientific progress depends not only on finding solutions, but on learning the rules that explain why they work and using that understanding to design better experiments. We introduce science sandboxes, a framework for studying this capability in AI agents through repeated cycles of experimentation, feedback, and hypothesis revision. Science sandboxes invite an agent to query the natural world in different ways, ranging from "wet" physical experiments, to "damp" predictive models trained on empirical data, to "dry" invented rules. By establishing a common experimental loop and a protocol for evaluating agents within it, science sandboxes allow assessment of both quantitative performance on specific metrics and qualitative scientific reasoning, across a spectrum of empirical verifiability. Here, we instantiate this framework in two biological settings, models of regulatory genomics and protein fitness prediction, and examine the capabilities of frontier agents. Across these settings, we could see when agents successfully optimized a quantitative metric without understanding the rules underlying the system. In particular, their scientific reasoning deteriorated when they encountered systems whose rules fell outside familiar biological priors. By highlighting such failure modes, science sandboxes make the frontier of scientific capability measurable and provide a controlled setting in which to study and ultimately expand it.

q-bio.QM