Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Shuhan Yuan

Publications and source records attributed to Shuhan Yuan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CellSecInspector: Safeguarding Cellular Networks via Automated Security Analysis on Specifications

The complexity, interdependence, and rapid evolution of 3GPP specifications present fundamental challenges for ensuring the security of modern cellular networks. Manual reviews and existing automated approaches, which often depend on rule-based parsing or small sets of manually crafted security requirements, fail to capture deep semantic dependencies, cross-sentence/clause relationships, and evolving specification behaviors. In this work, we present CellSecInspector, an automated framework for security analysis of 3GPP specifications. CellSecInspector extracts structured state-condition-action (SCA) representations, models mobile network procedures with comprehensive function chains, systematically validates them against 9 foundational security properties under 4 adversarial scenarios, and automatically generates test cases. This end-to-end approach enables the automated discovery of vulnerabilities without relying on manually predefined security requirements or rules. Applying CellSecInspector to the well-studied 5G and 4G NAS and RRC specifications and selected sections of TS 23.501 and TS 24.229, it discovers 43 vulnerabilities, 7 of which are previously unreported. Our findings show that CellSecInspector is a scalable, adaptive, and effective solution to assess 3GPP specifications for safeguarding operational and next-generation cellular networks.

cs.CR

Memorization Is Not Extraction: Tight Differential-Privacy Bounds and Audit Blind Spots

Memorization in large language models is measured through a zoo of definitions whose formal relations are unknown, and differential privacy (DP) is treated as a proxy against all of them at once. We pin down the exact DP constant for the two that carry the practical weight, counterfactual memorization and adaptive extraction, and show that they do not control each other. Under $f$-DP, every adaptive extraction protocol with list budget $m$ succeeds with probability at most $1-f(κ)$ for the oblivious baseline $κ$, and the bound is tight on a dense set of baselines: DP uniformly controls extraction exactly up to a threshold in how well the secret can be guessed a priori. Min-entropy certifies that baseline distribution-free, since $H_\infty\geε\log_2 e+\log_2(m/τ)$ holds extraction below a risk level $τ\le1/2$ under pure $ε$-DP for every prior, and is exact on uniform priors. On the memorization side, $f$-DP caps the counterfactual memorization of any bounded score at an advantage functional $η(f)$, equal to $\tanh(ε/2)$ under pure DP; for $k\ge2$ duplicated copies the naive $ε\mapsto kε$ bound $\tanh(kε/2)$ is unattainable, the exact constant being a closed-form staircase attained by geometric noisy counting. That cap is attained inside the local score class used in practice, and it is there that the two measures separate: one mechanism is memorized yet unextractable, another fully extractable yet exactly invisible to every loss-based score. The two-sided blind spot this opens for loss-based auditing and unlearning verification survives on billion-parameter models: a reserved-trigger release is recovered verbatim from one prompt while the audits practitioners deploy certify it clean.

cs.CR