Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Thomas Duzer

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Duzer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The Structure of a Non-Isometric Non-Contractive Bijection of a Hereditarily Precompact Quasi-Metric Space

On a hereditarily precompact quasi-metric space, every bijective non-contractive self-map has the following structure: the quasi-metric splits as $d = λ^- + D_0$. The invariant limit register $λ^-$ is a quasi-pseudo-metric below $d$ for which the map is an isometry, with totally bounded symmetrization on every orbit, so that the map's rigid shadow is a rotation of a compact monothetic group; the asymmetric limit structure on it, a priori only paratopological, carries the compact topology. The defect $D_0$ lies in a band between a past fee difference and the fee of its source, the fee nondecreasing along orbits and vanishing in the deep past. The defect is zero precisely when the map is an isometry. Deep sources are thus almost rigid: in the deep past the map is an isometry to within any $\varepsilon$, against every target. Every such map that is not an isometry is a toll over its rigid shadow, levied on a forward-invariant zone that sheds into the past. Two further facts are forced: the orbit of the source of any strict pair is infinite and already strict, and the source pays its whole defect on its own backward returns, uniformly on a chain-closed set of displacements. The band is attained at both ends, and beyond it the shape of the defect is not forced: three spirals over the circle show that the toll can depend on the target, that a source carrying a fee can descend for free, and that an ascent can carry defect; no rate of shedding is forced either, and for zone tolls (two-valued descent tolls that are shift-monotone and subadditive along their own routes) the fee reaches zero already at a finite depth, by the ascending chain condition on submonoids of $\mathbb{N}$. The results are machine-checked in Lean, apart from a few statements listed at the end.

math.GM↗

Compact Quasi-Metric Spaces Are Expand-Contract Plastic

On a totally bounded metric space every non-contractive self-map is an isometry. For quasi-metric spaces, taken T_1 throughout, this fails: Zavarzina gave a hereditarily precompact counterexample and asked whether bijectivity restores rigidity; the toll spiral shows that it does not. We prove that compactness does: every compact quasi-metric space is expand-contract plastic, that is, each of its bijective non-contractive self-maps is an isometry. Countable compactness suffices, as does compactness of the conjugate topology. Bijectivity cannot be dropped: a compact, hereditarily precompact quasi-metric on the natural numbers makes the shift non-contractive and not an isometry. For arbitrary non-contractive self-maps we prove rigidity when the space is hereditarily precompact and its conjugate topology is sequentially compact, in particular when it is hereditarily precompact and Yoneda complete; neither hypothesis can be dropped. In both theorems the T_1 axiom can be weakened to R_0, with hereditary precompactness read sequentially, but not to T_0: we construct a T_0 space with all the remaining hypotheses of both theorems, carrying a bijective non-contractive self-map that is not an isometry. Under R_0 the two-sided case reduces to the metric theorem; the one-sided theorems do not, and plasticity does not pass to the symmetrization even for compact spaces. In finite dimension the unit ball of a T_1 asymmetric normed space, forward or symmetric, and its sphere are rigid for every non-contractive self-map; without T_1 the forward ball need not be; in infinite dimension the symmetric ball and sphere are not plastic in general, and the forward versions carry the quasi-metric form of the unit-ball question of Cascales, Kadets, Orihuela and Wingler, which is posed. The two theorems are machine-checked in Lean, and so are the counterexamples, apart from a few statements listed at the end.

math.FA↗

Bijective Non-Contractive Maps of Hereditarily Precompact Quasi-Metric Spaces Need Not Be Isometries

Zavarzina asked whether every bijective non-contractive self-map of a precompact quasi-metric space is an isometry. We answer the question in the negative, in a stronger form: on a hereditarily precompact quasi-metric space (a tolled extension of the irrational rotation over Z), the shift is a bijective non-contractive map that is not an isometry. The construction generalizes: for every metric space Y, every bijective isometry $σ$ of Y, and every point whose $σ$-orbit is aperiodic and totally bounded, the tolled Z-extension is such a counterexample; instances include the irrational rotation and the p-adic odometer. The conjugate space is not precompact, so the two-sided hypothesis of Zavarzina's positive result is sharp, and the space is not expand-contract plastic. The core results, including the general scheme and the circle instance, are machine-checked in Lean 4 over mathlib, sorry-free (no unproved steps), under a pinned toolchain. A structural section proves a monochromy theorem: for every strict pair on a hereditarily precompact space, one endpoint's backward self-returns have self-defect at least a quarter of the pair's defect, uniformly on a chain-closed displacement set. Boundary results delimit what remains open: one-sided compactness together with separation.

math.GN↗